Thanks fot your input. I have now built a new xserver and the drm kernel
modules. glxgears runs at approx 160 fps for 1280x1024x16, with mmio and
agp 2x. This seems a little slow, how much is speed improved by
asynchronous or synchronous DMA? Which one is preferred?
A note on the build process of
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 01:12:27 +0100 (IST)
Dave Airlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > cvs -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/mesa co -D 2004-03-28 Mesa
> >
> > Besides that one bit it should build fine.
> >
> > /me pokes the mach64 maintainers. ISTR some discussion about merging mach64
> > anyway, e
On Monday 26 April 2004 20:18, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > So it's been merged then? As in, I should go update the wiki so we
> > don't get this complaint in the future?
>
> Already done.
You're my hero.
- ajax
---
This SF.net email is sponsored
--- Adam Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 26 April 2004 17:59, Felix Kühling wrote:
> > The mach64 driver has moved to the trunk. Try building it there.
> The
> > branch is broken for quite a while now. It won't be fixed.
>
> So it's been merged then? As in, I should go update the
On Monday 26 April 2004 17:59, Felix Kühling wrote:
> The mach64 driver has moved to the trunk. Try building it there. The
> branch is broken for quite a while now. It won't be fixed.
So it's been merged then? As in, I should go update the wiki so we don't get
this complaint in the future?
- aj
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 12:41:06AM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I made a fresh checkout of the mach64-0-0-7 cvs branch together with the
> Mesa and drm modules according to the Building and ATIMach64 web pages.
> However the build fails. The tail of world.log is as follows:
If it was
> cvs -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/mesa co -D 2004-03-28 Mesa
>
> Besides that one bit it should build fine.
>
> /me pokes the mach64 maintainers. ISTR some discussion about merging mach64
> anyway, even though it's insecure, perhaps with Big Fat Warning Signs or
> defaulting to mmio mode (wh
On Monday 26 April 2004 17:41, Svante Signell wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I made a fresh checkout of the mach64-0-0-7 cvs branch together with the
> Mesa and drm modules according to the Building and ATIMach64 web pages.
> However the build fails. The tail of world.log is as follows:
> ...
mach64-0-0-7 ne
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 00:41:06 +0200
Svante Signell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I made a fresh checkout of the mach64-0-0-7 cvs branch together with the
> Mesa and drm modules according to the Building and ATIMach64 web pages.
> However the build fails. The tail of world.log is as follo
Hello,
I made a fresh checkout of the mach64-0-0-7 cvs branch together with the
Mesa and drm modules according to the Building and ATIMach64 web pages.
However the build fails. The tail of world.log is as follows:
...
ln -s /usr/CVS/dri-cvs/Mesa/src/mesa/main/accum.h accum.h
make[5]: *** No rule
10 matches
Mail list logo
