Re: [Dri-devel] r128 version bump

2001-06-22 Thread Michel Dänzer
Brian Paul wrote: > > Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > > Brian Paul wrote: > > > > > No need to bump version number as this value isn't used anywhere in > > > the kernel module. > > > > Speaking of a version bump, it looks like the _major_ of the r128 driver > > in the trunk needs to be bumped (see

Re: [Dri-devel] r128 version bump

2001-06-22 Thread Brian Paul
Michel Dänzer wrote: > > Brian Paul wrote: > > > No need to bump version number as this value isn't used anywhere in > > the kernel module. > > Speaking of a version bump, it looks like the _major_ of the r128 driver in > the trunk needs to be bumped (see discussion on the Xpert list). I'm

[Dri-devel] r128 version bump

2001-06-21 Thread Michel Dänzer
Brian Paul wrote: > No need to bump version number as this value isn't used anywhere in > the kernel module. Speaking of a version bump, it looks like the _major_ of the r128 driver in the trunk needs to be bumped (see discussion on the Xpert list). I'm reluctant to do it myself as I don't h