Re: [Dri-devel] status page updates

2001-04-28 Thread Jeremy Katz
On Saturday, April 28 2001, Frank Worsley said: > Also, is the Rage 128 Mobility supported by the current Rage 128 driver? If > it is I would like to add that to the list too. Yep, it seems to work great for me. Just have to make sure bus mastering is enabled for the card. Jeremy -- Jeremy Ka

[Dri-devel] status page updates

2001-04-28 Thread Frank Worsley
Hey, hey ... I would like to update the current status page some more. Basically I would like to know which different versions of the Radeon chip are supported, ie: VE, ME, LE ??? There's been some questions regarding that on the FAQ comments. Also, is the Rage 128 Mobility supported by the curr

Re: [Dri-devel] status page

2001-04-24 Thread Ard van Breemen
On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 01:59:50PM -0700, Frank Worsley wrote: > Temporary page is at: http://dri.sourceforge.net/status2.phtml Commenting on status.html: Doesn't the STB/3dfx velocity series use the NVIDIA riva chipset? I haven't seen support for the RIVA chipset (I've got an STB velocity, don't

Re: [Dri-devel] status page

2001-04-23 Thread Jon Pennington
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 08:35:19AM -0700, Sottek, Matthew J wrote: > Frank, > The Intel graphics chips are integrated into the memory > controller and therefore are not really "Agp" or "PCI". > You could either just leave all the Intel chips as AGP, or > list them as "Integrated Chipset", but th

Re: [Dri-devel] status page

2001-04-23 Thread Brian Paul
Frank Worsley wrote: > > Ok, after thinking about this some more I guess there's no point in keeping > the page going as it is, since it doesn't make much sense. > > I've made a generic listing of cards, check it out at > http://dri.sourceforge.net/status2.phtml and if it's ok I will replace the

Re: [Dri-devel] status page

2001-04-23 Thread Frank Worsley
Ok, after thinking about this some more I guess there's no point in keeping the page going as it is, since it doesn't make much sense. I've made a generic listing of cards, check it out at http://dri.sourceforge.net/status2.phtml and if it's ok I will replace the current page. - Frank

Re: [Dri-devel] status page

2001-04-23 Thread Frank Worsley
> Treading dangerous ground. > > I'd remove this page, and maybe put in Daryll's suggestion of letting > people leave comments on whether it worked with their system. > > There are too many if's and but's that different systems introduce to > speculate whether it matches your legend key table. >

RE: [Dri-devel] status page

2001-04-23 Thread Sottek, Matthew J
riginal Message- From: Frank Worsley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2001 2:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Dri-devel] status page I've updated the status page a little bit. Could the developers please take a look at it and let me know if the information is accurate. Espec

Re: [Dri-devel] status page

2001-04-23 Thread Alan Hourihane
On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 01:59:50PM -0700, Frank Worsley wrote: > I've updated the status page a little bit. Could the developers please take > a look at it and let me know if the information is accurate. Especially the > information about supported buses. > > Temporary page is at: http://dri.sour

[Dri-devel] status page

2001-04-22 Thread Frank Worsley
I've updated the status page a little bit. Could the developers please take a look at it and let me know if the information is accurate. Especially the information about supported buses. Temporary page is at: http://dri.sourceforge.net/status2.phtml Thanks. - Frank ___