On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 00:45:33 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
Commit cbda12d77ea590082edb6d30bd342a67ebc459e0 (drm/i915: implement
new pm ops for i915), among other things, removed the .suspend and
.resume pointers from the struct drm_driver
On Tuesday 12 January 2010, Eric Anholt wrote:
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 00:45:33 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
Commit cbda12d77ea590082edb6d30bd342a67ebc459e0 (drm/i915: implement
new pm ops for i915), among other things, removed the .suspend
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 07:32:30 +1000
Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm in the 2-3 years at a minimum, with at least one kernel with no
serious regressions in Intel KMS, which we haven't gotten close to
yet. I'm not even sure the Intel guys are taking stable seriously
enough yet. So far I
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 2:38 AM, Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 07:32:30 +1000
Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm in the 2-3 years at a minimum, with at least one kernel with no
serious regressions in Intel KMS, which we haven't gotten close to
yet. I'm
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 06:12:37 +1000
Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 2:38 AM, Jesse Barnes
jbar...@virtuousgeek.org wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 07:32:30 +1000
Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm in the 2-3 years at a minimum, with at least one kernel with no
On Monday 11 January 2010, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 2:38 AM, Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org
wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 07:32:30 +1000
Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm in the 2-3 years at a minimum, with at least one kernel with no
serious regressions in
On Monday 11 January 2010, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 22:04:36 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Hmm, are you trying to say radeon is better at that?
My experience is quite the opposite to be honest.
radeon kms is in staging, doesn't pretend to be stable and force
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
On Monday 11 January 2010, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 22:04:36 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Hmm, are you trying to say radeon is better at that?
My experience is quite the opposite to be honest.
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 22:04:36 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Hmm, are you trying to say radeon is better at that?
My experience is quite the opposite to be honest.
radeon kms is in staging, doesn't pretend to be stable and force all
users to the experimental paths. So yes, I would say
On Tuesday 12 January 2010, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
On Monday 11 January 2010, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 22:04:36 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Hmm, are you trying to say radeon is better at that?
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 06:50:41PM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 02:15:41 + (GMT)
Dave Airlie airl...@linux.ie wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
Commit cbda12d77ea590082edb6d30bd342a67ebc459e0 (drm/i915:
implement new pm ops for i915), among other
On Saturday 09 January 2010, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jan 2010 16:50:57 -0800 (PST)
Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Which is functionally equivalent to my patch, because
i915_suspend/resume() won't be
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 06:50:41PM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
Linus, can we ever drop those old paths? Maybe after the new bits have
been around for awhile? Users of really old userspace stacks would
lose 3D support, but they'd still have 2D,
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 4:17 AM, Linus Torvalds
torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 06:50:41PM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
Linus, can we ever drop those old paths? Maybe after the new bits have
been around for awhile?
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 11:35 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
On Saturday 09 January 2010, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jan 2010 16:50:57 -0800 (PST)
Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Which is functionally
On Saturday 09 January 2010, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 11:35 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
On Saturday 09 January 2010, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jan 2010 16:50:57 -0800 (PST)
Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010,
From: Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
Commit cbda12d77ea590082edb6d30bd342a67ebc459e0 (drm/i915: implement
new pm ops for i915), among other things, removed the .suspend and
.resume pointers from the struct drm_driver object in i915_drv.c,
which broke resume without KMS on my MSI Wind U100.
Fix
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
Commit cbda12d77ea590082edb6d30bd342a67ebc459e0 (drm/i915: implement
new pm ops for i915), among other things, removed the .suspend and
.resume pointers from the struct drm_driver object in i915_drv.c,
On Fri, 8 Jan 2010 16:01:46 -0800 (PST)
Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
Commit cbda12d77ea590082edb6d30bd342a67ebc459e0 (drm/i915: implement
new pm ops for i915), among other
On Fri, 8 Jan 2010 16:01:46 -0800 (PST)
Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
Commit cbda12d77ea590082edb6d30bd342a67ebc459e0 (drm/i915: implement
new pm ops for i915), among other
On Saturday 09 January 2010, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jan 2010 16:06:59 -0800
Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jan 2010 16:01:46 -0800 (PST)
Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Saturday 09 January 2010, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
Commit cbda12d77ea590082edb6d30bd342a67ebc459e0 (drm/i915: implement
new pm ops for i915), among other things, removed the .suspend and
.resume
On Saturday 09 January 2010, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jan 2010 16:01:46 -0800 (PST)
Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
Commit cbda12d77ea590082edb6d30bd342a67ebc459e0
On Fri, 8 Jan 2010 16:06:59 -0800
Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jan 2010 16:01:46 -0800 (PST)
Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
Commit
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Which is functionally equivalent to my patch, because i915_suspend/resume()
won't be called by drm_class_suspend/resume() in the KMS case anyway.
Ahh, right you are - that class suspend function does a check for
DRIVER_MODESET, and only does the
On Fri, 8 Jan 2010 16:50:57 -0800 (PST)
Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Which is functionally equivalent to my patch, because
i915_suspend/resume() won't be called by drm_class_suspend/resume()
in the KMS case anyway.
From: Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
Commit cbda12d77ea590082edb6d30bd342a67ebc459e0 (drm/i915: implement
new pm ops for i915), among other things, removed the .suspend and
.resume pointers from the struct drm_driver object in i915_drv.c,
which broke resume without KMS on my MSI Wind
On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 02:15:41 + (GMT)
Dave Airlie airl...@linux.ie wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl
Commit cbda12d77ea590082edb6d30bd342a67ebc459e0 (drm/i915:
implement new pm ops for i915), among other things, removed
the .suspend and .resume pointers from the struct
28 matches
Mail list logo
