On Thursday, October 23, 2008 5:20 pm Jesse Barnes wrote:
> Ugg, get_fence was pretty broken in the !reg case... fixing that makes
> things a bit more stable...
And here's one that's actually pretty solid. It doesn't try to unbind from
get_fence (should be safe, but we don't want to do it anyway
On Thursday, October 23, 2008 3:51 pm Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 22, 2008 2:42 pm Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > Ok, this one actually works w/o corrupting your display. However, after
> > running for awhile I end up hitting the BUG_ON at i915_gem.c:1061, so I'm
> > hoping someone can te
On Thursday, October 23, 2008 5:09 pm Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Thursday, October 23, 2008 3:51 pm Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Wednesday, October 22, 2008 2:42 pm Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > Ok, this one actually works w/o corrupting your display. However,
> > > after running for awhile I end up hitti
On Wednesday, October 22, 2008 2:42 pm Jesse Barnes wrote:
> Ok, this one actually works w/o corrupting your display. However, after
> running for awhile I end up hitting the BUG_ON at i915_gem.c:1061, so I'm
> hoping someone can tell me where I messed up the list handling (the change
> in i915_ge
Ok, this one actually works w/o corrupting your display. However, after
running for awhile I end up hitting the BUG_ON at i915_gem.c:1061, so I'm
hoping someone can tell me where I messed up the list handling (the change in
i915_gem_retire_request tries to deal with that, since the flushing list
i
