Now that we're using the scaling property in the Intel driver I noticed
that the names were a bit confusing. I've corrected them according to
our discussion on IRC, though I've left out potential new additions for
a new scaling property with an integer (or two) for the scaling
factor. None of the
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 5:33 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> Now that we're using the scaling property in the Intel driver I noticed
> that the names were a bit confusing. I've corrected them according to
> our discussion on IRC, though I've left out potential new additions for
> a new scaling property
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:51:05 -0400
Alex Deucher wrote:
> > - { DRM_MODE_SCALE_NON_GPU, "Non-GPU" },
> > - { DRM_MODE_SCALE_FULLSCREEN, "Fullscreen" },
> > - { DRM_MODE_SCALE_NO_SCALE, "No scale" },
> > - { DRM_MODE_SCALE_ASPECT, "Aspect" },
> > + { DRM_MODE_SCALE_NON_
DRM_MODE_SCALE_NON_GPU was intended to let the monitor do the scaling,
in case you have a CRT or the monitors scalers are better.
I think your new name choice is less than ideal.
Maarten.
--
--
___
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 5:23 AM, Maarten Maathuis wrote:
> DRM_MODE_SCALE_NON_GPU was intended to let the monitor do the scaling,
> in case you have a CRT or the monitors scalers are better.
> I think your new name choice is less than ideal.
Good point. I think we should have:
None (sw or monitor
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 11:23:50 +0200
Maarten Maathuis wrote:
> DRM_MODE_SCALE_NON_GPU was intended to let the monitor do the scaling,
> in case you have a CRT or the monitors scalers are better.
> I think your new name choice is less than ideal.
If that's what it's supposed to be, then yes, it's no
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 11:23:50 +0200
> Maarten Maathuis wrote:
>
>> DRM_MODE_SCALE_NON_GPU was intended to let the monitor do the scaling,
>> in case you have a CRT or the monitors scalers are better.
>> I think your new name choice is less than
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
>> On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 11:23:50 +0200
>> Maarten Maathuis wrote:
>>
>>> DRM_MODE_SCALE_NON_GPU was intended to let the monitor do the scaling,
>>> in case you have a CRT or the monitors scale
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 12:22:17 -0400
Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Alex Deucher
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Jesse
> > Barnes wrote:
> >> On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 11:23:50 +0200
> >> Maarten Maathuis wrote:
> >>
> >>> DRM_MODE_SCALE_NON_GPU was intended to let th
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 12:22:17 -0400
Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Alex Deucher
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Jesse
> > Barnes wrote:
> >> On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 11:23:50 +0200
> >> Maarten Maathuis wrote:
> >>
> >>> DRM_MODE_SCALE_NON_GPU was intended to let th
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 12:22:17 -0400
> Alex Deucher wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Alex Deucher
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Jesse
>> > Barnes wrote:
>> >> On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 11:23:50 +0200
>> >> Maarten Maathuis
11 matches
Mail list logo