Re: [PATCH] drm: do not ignore detailed timings of EDID < 1.3

2009-08-15 Thread Anssi Hannula
Dave Airlie wrote: Currently detailed timings are ignored on EDID < 1.3 with the comment "EDID up to and including 1.2 may put monitor info here". However, the EDID Implementation Guide only says that on EDID 1.1 (which introduced monitor descriptors) and EDID 1.2, the first des

Re: [PATCH] drm: do not ignore detailed timings of EDID < 1.3

2009-08-14 Thread Dave Airlie
> > > >> Currently detailed timings are ignored on EDID < 1.3 with the comment > >> "EDID up to and including 1.2 may put monitor info here". However, the > >> EDID Implementation Guide only says that on EDID 1.1 (which introduced > >> monitor descriptors) and EDID 1.2, the first descriptor block

Re: [PATCH] drm: do not ignore detailed timings of EDID < 1.3

2009-08-14 Thread Dave Airlie
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 3:45 AM, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 10:38:31 -0700 > Anssi Hannula wrote: > >> Currently detailed timings are ignored on EDID < 1.3 with the comment >> "EDID up to and including 1.2 may put monitor info here". However, the >> EDID Implementation Guide only sa

Re: [PATCH] drm: do not ignore detailed timings of EDID < 1.3

2009-08-14 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 10:38:31 -0700 Anssi Hannula wrote: > Currently detailed timings are ignored on EDID < 1.3 with the comment > "EDID up to and including 1.2 may put monitor info here". However, the > EDID Implementation Guide only says that on EDID 1.1 (which introduced > monitor descriptors)

[PATCH] drm: do not ignore detailed timings of EDID < 1.3

2009-08-14 Thread Anssi Hannula
Currently detailed timings are ignored on EDID < 1.3 with the comment "EDID up to and including 1.2 may put monitor info here". However, the EDID Implementation Guide only says that on EDID 1.1 (which introduced monitor descriptors) and EDID 1.2, the first descriptor block of the detailed timing se