Hope this patch is OK.
With it I no more get infinite messages like:
Feb 27 15:48:39 localhost kernel: [drm:r300_do_cp_cmdbuf] R300_CMD_SCRATCH
Feb 27 15:48:39 localhost last message repeated 2 times
Feb 27 15:48:39 localhost kernel: [drm:r300_do_cp_cmdbuf] END
Feb 27 15:48:39 localhost kernel: [
Updated patch. Fix a check.
On Tuesday 27 February 2007 23:49, Panagiotis Papadakos wrote:
> Hope this patch is OK.
>
> With it I no more get infinite messages like:
>
> Feb 27 15:48:39 localhost kernel: [drm:r300_do_cp_cmdbuf] R300_CMD_SCRATCH
> Feb 27 15:48:39 localhost last message repeated 2 ti
Diving more into the code, I also found weird how the scratch cmd packet
is build in radeon_mm_use, in radeon_mm.c. I think it should be like in the
attached patch.
On Wednesday 28 February 2007 22:33, Panagiotis Papadakos wrote:
> Updated patch. Fix a check.
>
> On Tuesday 27 February 2007 23:49
On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 17:46:12 +0200
Panagiotis Papadakos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Diving more into the code, I also found weird how the scratch cmd
> packet is build in radeon_mm_use, in radeon_mm.c. I think it should
> be like in the attached patch.
This patch will break 64 bit systems. It onl
On Thursday 01 March 2007 20:11, Aapo Tahkola wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 17:46:12 +0200
>
> Panagiotis Papadakos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Diving more into the code, I also found weird how the scratch cmd
> > packet is build in radeon_mm_use, in radeon_mm.c. I think it should
> > be like in t
On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 21:33:16 +0200
Panagiotis Papadakos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 01 March 2007 20:11, Aapo Tahkola wrote:
> > On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 17:46:12 +0200
> >
> > Panagiotis Papadakos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Diving more into the code, I also found weird how the scratch
