Yet another bump.
On 3/5/07, Dave Airlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> in the DRM tree this needs to be done in a backwards compatible fashion...
>
> so in drm_compat.h we need to do
>
> #ifndef IRQF_SHARED
> #define IRQF_SHARED SA_SHIRQ
> #endif
>
> so we continue to build on older kernels..
>
>
in the DRM tree this needs to be done in a backwards compatible fashion...
so in drm_compat.h we need to do
#ifndef IRQF_SHARED
#define IRQF_SHARED SA_SHIRQ
#endif
so we continue to build on older kernels..
Dave.
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, Maarten Maathuis wrote:
> Bump.
>
> On 3/2/07, Maarten Maat
Bump.
On 3/2/07, Maarten Maathuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is for the drm in case that's not obvious from the patch, forget
> to mention that.
>
> On 3/2/07, Maarten Maathuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The use of SA_* is slowly being removed, at least that's my
> > impression. I use a
This is for the drm in case that's not obvious from the patch, forget
to mention that.
On 3/2/07, Maarten Maathuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The use of SA_* is slowly being removed, at least that's my
> impression. I use a realtime kernel and it was gone, it seems a
> similar thing might happen
The use of SA_* is slowly being removed, at least that's my
impression. I use a realtime kernel and it was gone, it seems a
similar thing might happen for other kernels in the near future (-mm
for 2.6.21).
Maarten.
fix.patch
Description: Binary data
-
