On Friday, January 9, 2009 12:28 am Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 10:45 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > Dunno if this is a good idea or not, but it would have helped with some
> > of the recent bugs.
>
> Sure about that? The sequence numbers may be completely different
> between CRTCs
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 10:45 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> Dunno if this is a good idea or not, but it would have helped with some of the
> recent bugs.
Sure about that? The sequence numbers may be completely different
between CRTCs.
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer |http://ww
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 17:30 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> "assuming you meant the other pipe" but less wordy. "Trying other pipe" is
> probably better.
We shouldn't spam the syslog with messages here; if it happens, it's
going to happen often. Perhaps just complaining once?
--
keith.pack...@in
On Thursday, January 8, 2009 5:25 pm Ian Romanick wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 10:45:16AM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > Dunno if this is a good idea or not, but it would have helped with some
> > of the recent bugs.
> >
> > --
> > Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
> >
> > diff
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 10:45:16AM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> Dunno if this is a good idea or not, but it would have helped with some of the
> recent bugs.
>
> --
> Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
> index
Dunno if this is a good idea or not, but it would have helped with some of the
recent bugs.
--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
index 1e787f8..8ae2a6a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/
