El mar. 02 de mar. de 2010, a las 22:06:51 +0100, Rafał Miłecki escribió:
> We tried to implement interruptible waiting with timeout (it was broken
> anyway) which was not a good idea as explained by Andrew. It's possible
> to avoid using additional variable but actually it inroduces using more
> c
W dniu 3 marca 2010 19:47 użytkownik Jaime Velasco Juan
napisał:
> El mar. 02 de mar. de 2010, a las 22:06:51 +0100, Rafał Miłecki escribió:
>> We tried to implement interruptible waiting with timeout (it was broken
>> anyway) which was not a good idea as explained by Andrew. It's possible
>> to a
We tried to implement interruptible waiting with timeout (it was broken
anyway) which was not a good idea as explained by Andrew. It's possible
to avoid using additional variable but actually it inroduces using more
complex in-kernel tools. So simply add one variable for condition.
Signed-off-by:
