On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 11:53 +0100, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Fri, 29 May 2009 19:58:36 +0530
> Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
>
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 09:34 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > > On Friday 29 May 2009 02:16:35 Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> > > > I am not sure whe
On Fri, 29 May 2009 19:58:36 +0530
Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 09:34 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > On Friday 29 May 2009 02:16:35 Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> > > I am not sure where this patch should go.
> > >
> > > So I am also mailing to Andrew an
Hi Andrew,
On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 09:34 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Friday 29 May 2009 02:16:35 Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> > I am not sure where this patch should go.
> >
> > So I am also mailing to Andrew and Dave, it they find this useful then
> > they can add in their tree.
>
> Dave i
On Friday 29 May 2009 02:16:35 Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 11:00 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > On Wednesday 20 May 2009 02:27:35 Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> > >
> > > intel_no_lvds[] does not require __initdata as it is used only by :
> > >
> > > void intel_lvds_i
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 11:00 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 May 2009 02:27:35 Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> >
> > intel_no_lvds[] does not require __initdata as it is used only by :
> >
> > void intel_lvds_init(struct drm_device *dev)
> >
> > fixes section mismatch warning:
> >
