From: Dave Airlie [mailto:airl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 5:09 PM
To: Bruce Chang
Cc: dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Joseph Chan; Benjamin Pan (Fremont);
Harald Welte; gre...@suse.de; Richard Lee
Subject: Re: [Patch 2/3] Resubmit VIA Chrome9 DRM via_chrome9 for upstream -
Header
July 17, 2009 5:09 PM
To: Bruce Chang
Cc: dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Joseph Chan; Benjamin Pan (Fremont);
Harald Welte; gre...@suse.de; Richard Lee
Subject: Re: [Patch 2/3] Resubmit VIA Chrome9 DRM via_chrome9 for upstream -
Header File
> 1. via_chrome9_3d_reg.h
> 2.
nal Message-
> From: Dave Airlie [mailto:airl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 5:09 PM
> To: Bruce Chang
> Cc: dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Joseph Chan; Benjamin Pan (Fremont);
> Harald Welte; gre...@suse.de; Richard Lee
> Subject: Re: [Patch 2/3] Resubmit V
Hi Dave,
thanks for your review.
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 07:08:33PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > 1. via_chrome9_3d_reg.h
> > 2. via_chrome9_dma.h
> > 3. via_chrome9_drm.h
> > 4. via_chrome9_drv.h
> > 5. via_chrome9_mm.h
> > 6. via_chrome9_verifier.h
>
> Is it possible to run a 64-bit Linux on a
; gre...@suse.de; Richard Lee
Subject: Re: [Patch 2/3] Resubmit VIA Chrome9 DRM via_chrome9 for upstream -
Header File
> 1. via_chrome9_3d_reg.h
> 2. via_chrome9_dma.h
> 3. via_chrome9_drm.h
> 4. via_chrome9_drv.h
> 5. via_chrome9_mm.h
> 6. via_chrome9_verifier.h
Is it possible to
> 1. via_chrome9_3d_reg.h
> 2. via_chrome9_dma.h
> 3. via_chrome9_drm.h
> 4. via_chrome9_drv.h
> 5. via_chrome9_mm.h
> 6. via_chrome9_verifier.h
Is it possible to run a 64-bit Linux on a chrome9 chipset onnected to
a 64-bit processor? if so you'll have to fix a lot of these ioctls up.
> +
> +stru
To whom it may ceoncern:
This patch contains the modification on the header files for the VIA
Chrome9 DRM kernel module based on kernel 2.6.31-rc3. The header files include:
1. via_chrome9_3d_reg.h
2. via_chrome9_dma.h
3. via_chrome9_drm.h
4. via_chrome9_drv.h
5. via_chrome9_mm.h
6. via_chrom
