Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
r200_context.h:98:1: warning: this is the location of the previous
definition
r300_ioctl.c: In function `r300ClearBuffer':
r300_ioctl.c:67: error: `drm_r300_cmd_header_t' undeclared (first use
in this function)
^^
Know
Jerome Glisse wrote:
Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
r200_context.h:98:1: warning: this is the location of the previous
definition
r300_ioctl.c: In function `r300ClearBuffer':
r300_ioctl.c:67: error: `drm_r300_cmd_header_t' undeclared (first
use in this function)
Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
r200_context.h:98:1: warning: this is the location of the previous
definition
r300_ioctl.c: In function `r300ClearBuffer':
r300_ioctl.c:67: error: `drm_r300_cmd_header_t' undeclared (first
use in this function)
Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
Jerome Glisse wrote:
Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
r200_context.h:98:1: warning: this is the location of the previous
definition
r300_ioctl.c: In function `r300ClearBuffer':
r300_ioctl.c:67: error: `drm_r300_cmd_header_t' undeclared (first
use in this
FYI,
Apparently, even though the DRM_SOURCE_PATH variable is set, it's
not getting checked. If I copy the r300_driver/drm directory to the
same directory as the Mesa source tree, the r300_dri.so library gets
built fine.
Now to test it :-)
Adam
Well, when I went to load the kernel
I've seen so much activity on the r300_driver recently, I thought it'd
be good time to test it out on my 9800 and give as much feedback as
possible.
Unfortunately, I'm not even able to get it to compile. I think I've
followed the instructions correctly. I actually copied the
r200_context.h:98:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
r300_ioctl.c: In function `r300ClearBuffer':
r300_ioctl.c:67: error: `drm_r300_cmd_header_t' undeclared (first use in this
function)
^^
Know what I'm doing wrong?
There
