This patch adds a sanity check to drmWaitVBlank to prevent hangs. Since the
server interrupts syscalls pretty frequently with SIGALM, we tend to restart
syscalls when EINTR is returned. That means when a vblank timeout happens,
we probably won't catch it (it happens after 3s, and SIGALM happens e
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 10:41 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> This patch adds a sanity check to drmWaitVBlank to prevent hangs. Since the
> server interrupts syscalls pretty frequently with SIGALM, we tend to restart
> syscalls when EINTR is returned. That means when a vblank timeout happens,
> we pro
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 10:41 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> This patch adds a sanity check to drmWaitVBlank to prevent hangs. Since the
> server interrupts syscalls pretty frequently with SIGALM, we tend to restart
> syscalls when EINTR is returned. That means when a vblank timeout happens,
> we pro
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 22:49 -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 10:41 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > This patch adds a sanity check to drmWaitVBlank to prevent hangs. Since the
> > server interrupts syscalls pretty frequently with SIGALM, we tend to restart
> > syscalls when EINTR
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 10:15 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 7, 2009 9:49 am Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 22:49 -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 10:41 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > > This patch adds a sanity check to drmWaitVBlank to pre
On Wednesday, January 7, 2009 10:36 am Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 10:15 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Wednesday, January 7, 2009 9:49 am Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 22:49 -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 10:41 -0800, Jesse Barnes w
On Wednesday, January 7, 2009 9:49 am Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 22:49 -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 10:41 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > This patch adds a sanity check to drmWaitVBlank to prevent hangs.
> > > Since the server interrupts syscalls pretty
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 10:15 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> Ok; I messed with drmIoctl because I thought I remembered you saying we
> shouldn't put the retry code there but rather in the individual ioctls that
> needed it. We should probably do that separately anyway though if we ever
> decide to
On Wednesday, January 7, 2009 10:54 am Keith Packard wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 10:15 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > Ok; I messed with drmIoctl because I thought I remembered you saying we
> > shouldn't put the retry code there but rather in the individual ioctls
> > that needed it. We should
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 11:11 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 7, 2009 10:54 am Keith Packard wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 10:15 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > Ok; I messed with drmIoctl because I thought I remembered you saying we
> > > shouldn't put the retry code there but
On Wednesday, January 7, 2009 11:34 am Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 11:11 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Wednesday, January 7, 2009 10:54 am Keith Packard wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 10:15 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > > Ok; I messed with drmIoctl because I thought I reme
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 11:34:42AM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 11:11 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Wednesday, January 7, 2009 10:54 am Keith Packard wrote:
> > > > +libdrm_la_LIBADD = -lrt
> > >
> > > I fear you'll need autoconf-fu for this?
> > >
> > > Otherwise, it looks
On Thursday, January 8, 2009 2:13 am Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 11:34:42AM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 11:11 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, January 7, 2009 10:54 am Keith Packard wrote:
> > > > > +libdrm_la_LIBADD = -lrt
> > > >
> > > > I f
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 11:13 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Thursday, January 8, 2009 2:13 am Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 11:34:42AM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 11:11 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday, January 7, 2009 10:54 am Keith Packar
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 09:27:25AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 11:13 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Thursday, January 8, 2009 2:13 am Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > You probably want to get the entire clock_gettime awesomeness, to avoid
> > > the pathological worst case of rew
On Friday, January 9, 2009 2:32 am Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 09:27:25AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 11:13 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > On Thursday, January 8, 2009 2:13 am Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > > You probably want to get the entire clock_gettime
16 matches
Mail list logo