On September 21, 2004 12:18 pm, "Dag Bakke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> and finally:
>
> 4. Is the 9250 supported by the current dri code?
Yes, I didn't have to play with the PCI IDs either. I just told xorg to use
the radeon driver.
--
Mark Lane, CET -- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sales Manager
- Original Message -
From: Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 14:02:16 -0400
To: Vladimir Dergachev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [r300] - likely compatibility w rv360?
> On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:27:23 -0400 (EDT), Vladimir Dergachev
> <[EM
On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 09:18:55AM -0800, Dag Bakke wrote:
> agpgart: Found an AGP 3.5 compliant device at :00:00.0.
> agpgart: Badness. Don't know which AGP mode to set. [cmd:1f000a0a tmp:1f000a0a f
> ell back to:- cmd:1f000a08 tmp:1f000a0a]
> agpgart: Bridge couldn't do AGP x4.
> agpgar
Alex Deucher wrote:
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 18:56:40 -0400 (EDT), Vladimir Dergachev
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think I've seen this one - check your BIOS settings - maybe you need to
enable something AGP related there.
As I recall, since the X server doesn't have official 8x agp support
yet for rade
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 18:56:40 -0400 (EDT), Vladimir Dergachev
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I think I've seen this one - check your BIOS settings - maybe you need to
> >> enable something AGP related there.
> >
> > As I recall, since the X server doesn't have official 8x agp support
> > yet for ra
I think I've seen this one - check your BIOS settings - maybe you need to
enable something AGP related there.
As I recall, since the X server doesn't have official 8x agp support
yet for radeons, you have to force the bridge into 4x mode in the bios
so it comes up in 4x mode.
How very interesting.
so it comes up in 4x mode.
Alex
Bingo.
My rv360 now runs all the r300_demo tests. They look about the same as the snapshots
on r300.sf.net. --triangles comes out a bit different than
http://r300.sourceforge.net/files/how_it_looks.1.png
I get one multicolored and one white triangle.
Yep, that's h
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:27:23 -0400 (EDT), Vladimir Dergachev
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 22 Sep 2004, Dag Bakke wrote:
> >
> > [drm] Initialized radeon 1.11.0 20020828 on minor 0: ATI Technologies Inc RV350
> > AR [Radeon 9600]
> > agpgart: Found an AGP 3.5 compliant device at :0
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004, Dag Bakke wrote:
[drm] Initialized radeon 1.11.0 20020828 on minor 0: ATI Technologies Inc RV350
AR [Radeon 9600]
agpgart: Found an AGP 3.5 compliant device at :00:00.0.
agpgart: Badness. Don't know which AGP mode to set. [cmd:1f000a0a tmp:1f000a0a f
ell back to:- cmd:1f00
- Original Message -
From: Vladimir Dergachev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 01:23:38 -0400 (EDT)
To: Dag Bakke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [r300] - likely compatibility w rv360?
>
> Hi Dag,
>
> Try this: before starting X switch to ano
Hi,
On Wednesday 22 September 2004 00:45, Dag Bakke wrote:
> If I load "dri" in my xorg.conf, the graphics gets wedged as soon
> as I start X. I get more or less garbled stuff from the previous session.
I
> can move the cursor, but that's it. I can not exit from X with
> ctrl-alt-backspace, or sh
Hi Dag,
Try this: before starting X switch to another console and execute:
sleep 15 ; dmesg > dmesg.1 ; sync
Then start X, wait 30 seconds and shutdown your machine after that - this
will let you look at dmesg messages.
Also see below:
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004, Dag Bakke wrote:
I have tried the two
- Original Message -
From: Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 21:40:54 +0100
To: Dag Bakke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [r300] - likely compatibility w rv360?
> On Maw, 2004-09-21 at 19:18, Dag Bakke wrote:
> > 1. Is the rv360 (9600xt) close eno
On Maw, 2004-09-21 at 19:18, Dag Bakke wrote:
> 1. Is the rv360 (9600xt) close enough to the developers hardware to
> a) benefit from the 2d improvements already made w.r.t. CP acceleration
> b) be of any use for testing purposes
The 6.8.0 server supports 2D acceleration up to the PCI Express car
On Tuesday 21 September 2004 20:18, Dag Bakke wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I am very happy to see that the more recent Radeons are being looked into.
>
> A few questions:
> 1. Is the rv360 (9600xt) close enough to the developers hardware to
> a) benefit from the 2d improvements already made w.r.t. CP accele
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 10:18:01 -0800, Dag Bakke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I am very happy to see that the more recent Radeons are being looked into.
>
> A few questions:
> 1. Is the rv360 (9600xt) close enough to the developers hardware to
> a) benefit from the 2d improvements already ma
Hi.
I am very happy to see that the more recent Radeons are being looked into.
A few questions:
1. Is the rv360 (9600xt) close enough to the developers hardware to
a) benefit from the 2d improvements already made w.r.t. CP acceleration
b) be of any use for testing purposes
If the answer to a) i
17 matches
Mail list logo
