On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 23:00:37 +0200
Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Andrew Morton
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 11:22:35 +0200
> > "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote:
> >
> >> On Wednesday 09 June 2010, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >> > The patch from [1] is still missing.
> >> >
> >> >
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 11:22:35 +0200
"Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 June 2010, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > The patch from [1] is still missing.
> >
> >"cpufreq-call-nr_iowait_cpu-with-disabled-preemption.patch" from
> > Dmitry Monakhoc
> >
> > Tested-by: Sedat Dilek
> > Tested-by Mac
* Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 2010-06-11 10:32, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Jens Axboe wrote:
> >
> >> On 2010-06-09 03:53, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Bug-Entry: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16129
> Subject : BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [] co
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > That has a "reverting the commit fixes it", and a confirmation from Nick
> > Bowler.
> >
> > Eric, Carl: should I just revert that commit? Or do you have a fix?
>
> This one is reported to have been fixed already. Closed now.
Heh. That "f
The patch from [1] is still missing.
"cpufreq-call-nr_iowait_cpu-with-disabled-preemption.patch" from
Dmitry Monakhoc
Tested-by: Sedat Dilek
Tested-by Maciej Rutecki
I have already reported this issue on LKML [2] and cpufreq ML [3].
- Sedat -
[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/cpufreq/msg01
On 2010-06-09 11:32, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> This should be fixed by commit 28f4197e which was merged on friday.
>
> The scheduler commit adding local_clock() (for .36) is:
>
> c676329: sched_clock: Add local_clock() API and improve documentation
>
> So once that is upstream the block IO statist
* Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 2010-06-09 03:53, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16129
> >> Subject: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [] code:
> >> jbd2/sda2
> >> Submitter : Jan Kreuzer
> >> Date : 2010-06-05
On Wednesday 09 June 2010, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> The patch from [1] is still missing.
>
>"cpufreq-call-nr_iowait_cpu-with-disabled-preemption.patch" from
> Dmitry Monakhoc
>
> Tested-by: Sedat Dilek
> Tested-by Maciej Rutecki
>
> I have already reported this issue on LKML [2] and cpufreq ML
On Wednesday 09 June 2010, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> [ Added lots of cc's to direct specific people to look at the regressions
> that may or may not be theirs... ]
>
> On Wed, 9 Jun 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > * Quite a few of the already reported regressions may be related to the
On Wednesday 09 June 2010, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em 08-06-2010 22:53, Linus Torvalds escreveu:
>
> >
> >> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16037
> >> Subject: NULL Pointer dereference in
> >> __ir_input_register/budget_ci_attach
> >> Submitter : Sean Finney
On Wednesday 09 June 2010, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 2010-06-09 03:53, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16129
> >> Subject: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [] code:
> >> jbd2/sda2
> >> Submitter : Jan Kreuzer
> >> Date
On 2010-06-09 03:53, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> Bug-Entry: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16129
>> Subject : BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [] code:
>> jbd2/sda2
>> Submitter: Jan Kreuzer
>> Date : 2010-06-05 06:15 (4 days old)
>
> This seems
On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 18:53:55 -0700 (PDT), Linus Torvalds
wrote:
> And some of them do seem to be bisected to likely culprits and/or have
> patches that are claimed to have fixed them.
>
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16163
> > Subject : [2.6.35-rc1 Regression] i
* Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16129
> > Subject : BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [] code:
> > jbd2/sda2
> > Submitter : Jan Kreuzer
> > Date: 2010-06-05 06:15 (4 days old)
>
> This seems to have
Em 08-06-2010 22:53, Linus Torvalds escreveu:
>
>> Bug-Entry: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16037
>> Subject : NULL Pointer dereference in
>> __ir_input_register/budget_ci_attach
>> Submitter: Sean Finney
>> Date : 2010-05-23 19:52 (17 days old)
>
> Perhaps re
[ Added lots of cc's to direct specific people to look at the regressions
that may or may not be theirs... ]
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> * Quite a few of the already reported regressions may be related to the bug
>fixed by 386f40c86d6c8d5b717ef20620af1a750d0dacb4 (Re
[NOTES:
* This by no means is a complete list, but we only put e-mail reports that
are at least 1 week old into the Bugzilla.
* Quite a few of the already reported regressions may be related to the bug
fixed by 386f40c86d6c8d5b717ef20620af1a750d0dacb4 (Revert "tty: fix a little
bug in sc
17 matches
Mail list logo
