On Sun, 2004-10-31 at 12:42, David wrote:
> I'm using savage and common snapshots from 20041015. I hope these are not too
> old.
Can be old, I think this bug has fixed around 20041018 and some others
improvements earlier.
--
Sérgio M. B.
--
On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 17:01:29 +0100, David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> El Lunes, 1 de Noviembre del 2004 4:22 PM, Alex Deucher escribió:
>
>
> > On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 13:42:32 +0100, David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi. While the current Xv implementation is far better than the old one
> > > t
El Lunes, 1 de Noviembre del 2004 4:22 PM, Alex Deucher escribió:
> On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 13:42:32 +0100, David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi. While the current Xv implementation is far better than the old one
> > there are still a few glitches I noticed so far:
> >
> > * 4 pixels always missing
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 13:42:32 +0100, David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi. While the current Xv implementation is far better than the old one there
> are still a few glitches I noticed so far:
>
> * 4 pixels always missing on the right side on the screen
> * The old "shadowing" effect is showed on
Hi. While the current Xv implementation is far better than the old one there
are still a few glitches I noticed so far:
* 4 pixels always missing on the right side on the screen
* The old "shadowing" effect is showed on certain conditions (depending on
input sizes). I only tested a few sizes: 76
