Current redhat xorg-x11-Mesa-libGL-6.7.0-2.i386.rpm

2004-05-18 Thread Jon Smirl
DRI is definitely working in this build, glxgears is 152FPS on a Rage128. But when I do glxinfo it reports the software driver: OpenGL renderer string: Mesa GLX Indirect Or did someone fix the software render? I used to get about 3FPS with it. Maybe something is broken in the DRI into xorg server

Re: Current redhat xorg-x11-Mesa-libGL-6.7.0-2.i386.rpm

2004-05-18 Thread Dave Airlie
> But when I do glxinfo it reports the software driver: > OpenGL renderer string: Mesa GLX Indirect aet LIBGL_DEBUG to all and see if it prints anything.. Dave. > > Or did someone fix the software render? I used to get about 3FPS with it. > > Maybe something is broken in the DRI into xorg server

Re: Current redhat xorg-x11-Mesa-libGL-6.7.0-2.i386.rpm

2004-05-18 Thread Jon Smirl
It looks like something is not built right... name of display: :0.0 libGL error: dlopen /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/r128_dri.so failed (/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/r128_dri.s o: undefined symbol: _glapi_Dispatch) libGL error: unable to find driver: r128_dri.so = Jon Smirl [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Current redhat xorg-x11-Mesa-libGL-6.7.0-2.i386.rpm

2004-05-18 Thread Adam Jackson
On Tuesday 18 May 2004 22:34, Jon Smirl wrote: > DRI is definitely working in this build, glxgears is 152FPS on a Rage128. > But when I do glxinfo it reports the software driver: > OpenGL renderer string: Mesa GLX Indirect How fast is the CPU? I've seen 200FPS in glxgears in software with a 2GHz

Re: Current redhat xorg-x11-Mesa-libGL-6.7.0-2.i386.rpm

2004-05-19 Thread Jon Smirl
--- Adam Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From your second post it looks like the same issue as > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=dri-users&m=108328244131329&w=2 . Run ldd on > glxgears and see where it's getting libGL from. > > I'm pulling down the SRPM now, I'll take a look in the morning

Re: Current redhat xorg-x11-Mesa-libGL-6.7.0-2.i386.rpm

2004-05-19 Thread Jon Smirl
Getting rid of the copy in /usr/X11R6/lib/tls doesn't make a difference. --- Jon Smirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- Adam Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From your second post it looks like the same issue as > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=dri-users&m=108328244131329&w=2 . Run ldd

Re: Current redhat xorg-x11-Mesa-libGL-6.7.0-2.i386.rpm

2004-05-19 Thread Alex Deucher
--- Jon Smirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- Adam Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From your second post it looks like the same issue as > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=dri-users&m=108328244131329&w=2 . > Run ldd on > > glxgears and see where it's getting libGL from. > > > > I'm pu

Re: Current redhat xorg-x11-Mesa-libGL-6.7.0-2.i386.rpm

2004-05-19 Thread Jon Smirl
--- Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- Jon Smirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- Adam Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > From your second post it looks like the same issue as > > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=dri-users&m=108328244131329&w=2 . > > Run ldd on > > > glxge

Re: Current redhat xorg-x11-Mesa-libGL-6.7.0-2.i386.rpm

2004-05-19 Thread Jon Smirl
I got this working. Something is wrong in those rpm's when they overlaid the -0.5 versions. For example 0.5 has the tls subdir and -2 does not. I whacked my X11R6 tree and reinstalled from the -2 rpms and everything works. I didn't spend the time tracking things down but some files that needed to