On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 01:54, Ronny V. Vindenes wrote: > On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 00:43, Roland Scheidegger wrote: > > Ronny V. Vindenes wrote: > > > Something in the last week or two broke the r200 driver. After I cvs > > > update'ed and recompiled yesterday, I get this error: > > > > > > (EE) RADEON(0): RADEONCPGetBuffer: CP GetBuffer -1020 > > > (EE) RADEON(0): GetBuffer timed out, resetting engine... > > > (EE) RADEON(0): RADEONCPGetBuffer: CP reset -1020 > > > (EE) RADEON(0): RADEONCPGetBuffer: CP start -1020 > > > > > > and it gets stuck there repeating the error over and over (the first > > > time it happened the log grew to almost 800mb before I noticed that > > > something was wrong). > > > > > > Reverting to XFree86 Version 4.3.0 (Fedora Core 1: 4.3.0-42), everything > > > works as normal, and if I then reinstall cvs version it works until the > > > next cold boot. I'm guessing something isn't being initialized correctly > > > in current cvs. > > > > > > Card is 9000/128mb under linux 2.6.0-test9 (athlon64 running in pure > > > 32bit mode) with an lcd connected to dvi. > > > > > > The (cut down) log is here: > > > http://www.lstud.ii.uib.no/~s864/XFree86.0.log > > > > From the log, the card gets detected as a PCI card, but from the bus id > > I'd say it's a AGP card, is that true? In that case, it looks like the > > test for AGP/PCI doesn't work correctly. > > It is an AGP card, but the amd64-agp module in 2.6.0-test9 doesn't > detect the VIA K8T800 chipset [1] (agpgart in 2.4.23-pre9 does detect > it, but XFree86 still defaults to pcigart [2]). > > > In radeon_driver.c, it says "Following detection method works for all > > cards tested so far." Guess your card is the first it doesn't :-( > > If that's the case, you can try to get it to work with "BusType" "AGP" > > in the XF86Config file. > > Though I'd have assumed that a AGP card detected as PCI should still work. > > Setting "BusType" "AGP" makes no difference. > > Just to clarify, it is detected as PCI when using older working also. > > [1] I can get it to load by some hand tweaking of some of the tests in > the module, but it still works no better than 2.4.23-pre9. > > [2] Someone with the same motherboard is seeing the same problem with agp > not working: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107805
Yesterday's patches in cvs not only fixed the CP errors, they also fixed my AGP issues. -- Ronny V. Vindenes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
