Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 10:50:01AM -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
I must say that I am very impressed with how far the MGA driver has come
since you started working on it. Now the only thing that's missing is
support for PCI cards. ;)
A quick fix would be simply enabling PCI ca
--- Ian Romanick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 10:50:01AM -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
> >
> >>I must say that I am very impressed with how far the MGA driver has
> come
> >>since you started working on it. Now the only thing that's missing
> is
> >
On Gwe, 2004-03-12 at 21:40, Ian Romanick wrote:
> MGADRIPciInit wouldn't be a complete duplication of MGADRIAgpInit
> because I don't intend to (initially) support PCIGART. Even when
> PCIGART is supported, not all chips in the MGA family support it. Is
> the PCI G450 the only one?
Is there
Alex Deucher wrote:
There was a website with support for the PCI G450 (for alpha I think):
http://www.instmath.rwth-aachen.de:8000/linux/G450-PCI/
However it seems to be down at the moment. Someone on the ML knew the
guy who was doing the work. perhaps they an find out the state of it.
It's been
Alan Cox wrote:
On Gwe, 2004-03-12 at 21:40, Ian Romanick wrote:
MGADRIPciInit wouldn't be a complete duplication of MGADRIAgpInit
because I don't intend to (initially) support PCIGART. Even when
PCIGART is supported, not all chips in the MGA family support it. Is
the PCI G450 the only one?
I
--- Ian Romanick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alex Deucher wrote:
>
> > There was a website with support for the PCI G450 (for alpha I
> think):
> > http://www.instmath.rwth-aachen.de:8000/linux/G450-PCI/
> > However it seems to be down at the moment. Someone on the ML knew
> the
> > guy who was
Alex Deucher wrote:
--- Ian Romanick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alex Deucher wrote:
As I recall the G450-PCI cards were just AGP chips with an agp to pci
bridge. Perhaps you need to hack up an agpgart driver for the bridge?
Also, for the pci g450, matrox only supported 3D on motherboards with
in
> Then comes the kernel. :( I started looking that the ILOAD code in
> mga_state.c. Basically, it looks like everything assume the source
> buffers are in AGP space. I'm guessing that I could just look at the
> flags field in the drm_device_dma structure and only set the
> MGA_SRCACC_AGP bi
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 01:40:30PM -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
>
> I want to initially support this by just "disabling" AGP texturing. I
> looked in the DRI driver, and it looks like this can be done with some
> trivial changes in mga_xmesa.c. Basically, the code just needs to
> handle the cas
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 03:39:50PM -0800, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > > As I recall the G450-PCI cards were just AGP chips with an agp to
> > pci
> > > bridge. Perhaps you need to hack up an agpgart driver for the
> > bridge?
> > > Also, for the pci g450, matrox only supported 3D on motherboards
> >
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
Then comes the kernel. :( I started looking that the ILOAD code in
mga_state.c. Basically, it looks like everything assume the source
buffers are in AGP space. I'm guessing that I could just look at the
flags field in the drm_device_dma structure and only set th
> > The current PCI interface to the iommu doesn't allow you to explicitely
> > ask an sg list to be force-merged into a single segment though that
> > could be added via some platform hooks. That would probably work if
> > that is the only DMA allocation you do on this TCE table. Those machines
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
