On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 02:40:00AM +0100, Bernhard Kaindl wrote:
TDFX didn't required any AGP support, so there's work to be done there.
Seems so, the x86_64 developers should be able to give some more info,
e.g. I've read in arch/x86_64/kernel/pci-gart.c that the AMD Hammer has
an IOMMU
Hi,
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, Jens Owen wrote:
Keep in mind that the TDFX driver was ported to IA-64 many moons ago. I
know Don Dugger had 32 bit applications (running in a 32 bit subsystem,
w/ a 32 bit client side driver) direct rendering to the tdfx display
controlled by a 64 bit server
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ian Romanick
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 12:29 PM
To: DRI developer's list
Subject: [Dri-devel] 64-bit kernel, 32-bit user. Possible? Painful?
So, I was thinking about some CPUs that are about
Title: RE: [Dri-devel] 64-bit kernel, 32-bit user. Possible? Painful?
My question is, what are the gottchas of having the DRM run
in a 64-bit
kernel and the rest of the driver run in either a 32-bit
application or
a 64-bit application? Will it even matter? If it will
matter
