David Dawes wrote:
No, I think it should be intel_845_setup too, since the 845G docs on
Intel's public web site show that the behaviour is like the 845 when
the on-board graphics isn't enabled. I made that change in my
locally maintained version of the agpgart driver a little while ago,
but
Dave Jones wrote:
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 01:07:45PM +0100, Nicolas ASPERT wrote:
IIRC, the 845G is a new version of the 830MP chipset (it had been
added by Abraham vd Merwe Graeme Fisher some months ago), but acts
basically just as the 830MP. Therefore the entry is correct Or maybe
Title: RE: [Dri-devel] Re: 2.4.20 AGP for I845 wrong ?
Accoding to the official Linux pci database at
http://www.yourvote.com
the strings in the table should be:
INTEL_I845,
Intel,
i845 E/MP/MZ,
and
INTEL_I845_G,
Intel,
i845 G/GL/GV/GE/PE,
I think that would bring a lot more
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 12:45:49PM +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
In any case I don't think the string in the informational is very useful --
it's a potentially inaccurate translation of state from *another* module, so
I'm just removing the lot.
Cool, that gets my vote too 8-)
Dave
Dave Jones wrote:
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 12:45:49PM +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
In any case I don't think the string in the informational is very useful --
it's a potentially inaccurate translation of state from *another* module, so
I'm just removing the lot.
Cool, that gets my vote
