Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Keith Whitwell wrote:
>
>> Although we still have a couple of bugs & a lockup on the tcl branch,
>> the situation is in general better than what's on the trunk & I'd like
>> to get that code merged now. This will also help get the 8500 branch
>> started.
>>
>
> OK. I
José Fonseca wrote:
> On 2002.06.12 17:01 Keith Whitwell wrote:
>
>> Keith Whitwell wrote:
>>
>>> Although we still have a couple of bugs & a lockup on the tcl branch,
>>> the situation is in general better than what's on the trunk & I'd
>>> like to get that code merged now. This will also hel
On 2002.06.12 17:01 Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Keith Whitwell wrote:
>> Although we still have a couple of bugs & a lockup on the tcl branch,
>> the situation is in general better than what's on the trunk & I'd like
>> to get that code merged now. This will also help get the 8500 branch
>> starte
Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Although we still have a couple of bugs & a lockup on the tcl branch,
> the situation is in general better than what's on the trunk & I'd like
> to get that code merged now. This will also help get the 8500 branch
> started.
>
OK. It's merged.
Keith
__
On Tue, 2002-06-11 at 23:05, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Tue, 2002-06-11 at 19:53, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> >
> >>Jacek Popławski wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 06:44:27PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> Yes, it seems like there's a problem that has
Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-06-11 at 19:53, Keith Whitwell wrote:
>
>>Jacek Popławski wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 06:44:27PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
>>>
>>>
Yes, it seems like there's a problem that has to be resolved before the
merge. Have you tried the tcl branch
On Tue, 2002-06-11 at 19:53, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Jacek Popławski wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 06:44:27PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> >
> >>Yes, it seems like there's a problem that has to be resolved before the
> >>merge. Have you tried the tcl branch with your card?
> >>
> >
> > I
Jacek Popławski wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 06:44:27PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
>
>>Yes, it seems like there's a problem that has to be resolved before the
>>merge. Have you tried the tcl branch with your card?
>>
>
> I don't have Radeon VE, but I know someone who has it (using radeon
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 06:44:27PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Yes, it seems like there's a problem that has to be resolved before the
> merge. Have you tried the tcl branch with your card?
I don't have Radeon VE, but I know someone who has it (using radeon binaries
from dri.sf.net downloads)
Jacek Popławski wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 12:08:38PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
>>Will the issues with non-TCL hardware be taken care of after the merge?
>>
>
> Is it possible that there will be any trouble with Radeon VE card (without T&L
> support) after merge?
Yes, it seems like th
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 12:08:38PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> Will the issues with non-TCL hardware be taken care of after the merge?
Is it possible that there will be any trouble with Radeon VE card (without T&L
support) after merge?
__
On Tue, 2002-06-11 at 11:56, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Although we still have a couple of bugs & a lockup on the tcl branch, the
> situation is in general better than what's on the trunk & I'd like to get that
> code merged now. This will also help get the 8500 branch started.
Will the issues wi
12 matches
Mail list logo
