Re: Removal of mach64

2010-02-10 Thread Catalin Patulea
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Alex Deucher wrote: > You might check if your bios has an option to enable an irq for vga > devices.  You'll need an irq for vblank support, but beyond that I > don't recall what else the mach64 could use irqs for. Unfortunately, no such option in the BIOS. I thoug

Re: Removal of mach64

2010-02-09 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 03:40:34AM -0500, Catalin Patulea wrote: > Hmm, I was able to get the driver working, but I have some more > questions; let me first give you some background. > > My box is a Dell PowerEdge 1600SC server with an integrated ATI Rage XL: > $ sudo lspci -vs 0e > 00:0e.0 VGA co

Re: Removal of mach64

2010-02-09 Thread Alex Deucher
2010/2/9 Catalin Patulea : > Hmm, I was able to get the driver working, but I have some more > questions; let me first give you some background. > > My box is a Dell PowerEdge 1600SC server with an integrated ATI Rage XL: > $ sudo lspci -vs 0e > 00:0e.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies I

Re: Removal of mach64

2010-02-09 Thread Alexander Lam
2010/2/9 Catalin Patulea : > Hmm, I was able to get the driver working, but I have some more > questions; let me first give you some background. > > My box is a Dell PowerEdge 1600SC server with an integrated ATI Rage XL: > $ sudo lspci -vs 0e > 00:0e.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies I

Re: Removal of mach64

2010-02-09 Thread Catalin Patulea
Hmm, I was able to get the driver working, but I have some more questions; let me first give you some background. My box is a Dell PowerEdge 1600SC server with an integrated ATI Rage XL: $ sudo lspci -vs 0e 00:0e.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage XL (rev 27) Subsystem:

Re: Removal of mach64

2010-02-07 Thread Catalin Patulea
2010/2/7 Kristian Høgsberg : > They live in the kernel. I can't seem to find them there.. perhaps I'm looking in the wrong place: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=tree;f=drivers/gpu/drm --

Re: Removal of mach64

2010-02-07 Thread Dave Airlie
> > Except for mach64 :-) Unless I'm mistaken, that never made it into the > linux kernel. > If someone wants to add mach64 to staging it would be possible, it would be nice if clean patches that pass checkpatch.pl could be constructed for it. Since I think all the security issues were resol

Re: Removal of mach64

2010-02-07 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
On 02/07/10 13:24, Kristian Høgsberg wrote: > On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 1:32 AM, Catalin Patulea wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I am interested in getting DRI working on my ATI Rage XL card under >> 2.6.31-14 with mach64_drv 6.8.2 (Xorg 1.6.3 from Ubuntu Karmic koala). >> Git says that the mach64 drive

Re: Removal of mach64

2010-02-07 Thread Kristian Høgsberg
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 1:32 AM, Catalin Patulea wrote: > Hello, > > I am interested in getting DRI working on my ATI Rage XL card under > 2.6.31-14 with mach64_drv 6.8.2 (Xorg 1.6.3 from Ubuntu Karmic koala). > Git says that the mach64 driver was deleted, along with shared-code, > linux-core, etc,

Re: Removal of mach64

2010-02-07 Thread Alexander Lam
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 1:32 AM, Catalin Patulea wrote: > Hello, > > I am interested in getting DRI working on my ATI Rage XL card under > 2.6.31-14 with mach64_drv 6.8.2 (Xorg 1.6.3 from Ubuntu Karmic koala). > Git says that the mach64 driver was deleted, along with shared-code, > linux-core, etc,