Eric Anholt wrote:
>> I see two problems with this: One is cosmetic in that
>> DRM_BO_FLAG_CACHED_MAPPED doesn't have the same semantics as
>> !DRM_BO_FLAG_CACHED. You can't use it for user-space buffer pools.
>> The other one is that TG will be needing the functionality of
>> !DRM_BO_FLAG_CACHE
On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 01:25 +0100, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> Eric Anholt wrote:
> >
> >> c) User-space bo-caching and reuse.
> >> d) User-space buffer pools.
> >>
> >> TG is heading down the d) path since it also fixes the texture
> >> granularity problem.
> >>
> >
> > There's no texture gra
Thomas Hellström wrote:
> Eric Anholt wrote:
>
>>
>> Going from CACHED_MAPPED back to uncached even with buffer reuse is a
>> 22% performance drop (but at least it's not the 79% hit to the face you
>> get without buffer reuse).
>>
>>
> Hmm, this sounds odd. That simply means you must still be do
Eric Anholt wrote:
>
>> c) User-space bo-caching and reuse.
>> d) User-space buffer pools.
>>
>> TG is heading down the d) path since it also fixes the texture
>> granularity problem.
>>
>
> There's no texture granularity problem on Intel, right, given that we
> have a fixed mipmap layout? O
On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 11:08 +0100, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> Eric Anholt wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 10:08 +0100, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> >
> >> Eric Anholt wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 06:08 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote
> >> Remove unused DRM_FENCE_FLAG_WAIT_IGNORE_SIGNALS.
Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 10:08 +0100, Thomas Hellström wrote:
>
>> Eric Anholt wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 06:08 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
>>>
>>>
> I wasn't planning on a Mesa 7.1 (trunk code) release for a while, but I
> could finish up 7.0.3
On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 10:08 +0100, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> Eric Anholt wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 06:08 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >
> >>> I wasn't planning on a Mesa 7.1 (trunk code) release for a while, but I
> >>> could finish up 7.0.3 at any moment. I have to admit that I haven'
Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 06:08 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
>>> I wasn't planning on a Mesa 7.1 (trunk code) release for a while, but I
>>> could finish up 7.0.3 at any moment. I have to admit that I haven't
>>> actually tested Mesa 7.0.3 with current X code in quite a while
