Re: Regression in i915 on 2.6.34-rc1

2010-03-25 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Sun, 2010-03-21 at 18:19 -0600, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 08:26:59 -0700 > Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > > > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15533 > > > > Any luck testing the patch from the bugzilla? I'd really like to get > > this figured out so we can get the fix

Re: Regression in i915 on 2.6.34-rc1

2010-03-21 Thread Pete Zaitcev
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 08:26:59 -0700 Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15533 > > Any luck testing the patch from the bugzilla? I'd really like to get > this figured out so we can get the fix in the next -rc and move on > to the next _CRS issue :-) I was on v

Re: Regression in i915 on 2.6.34-rc1

2010-03-17 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Monday 15 March 2010 11:51:01 am Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Saturday 13 March 2010 08:02:24 pm Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 13:46 -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > > > On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 22:37:56 -0700 > > > Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks for the report. Would you mind

Re: Regression in i915 on 2.6.34-rc1

2010-03-16 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Saturday 13 March 2010 08:02:24 pm Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 13:46 -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > > On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 22:37:56 -0700 > > Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > > > Thanks for the report. Would you mind posting the entire dmesg > > > log, /proc/iomem contents, and "lspci

Re: Regression in i915 on 2.6.34-rc1

2010-03-14 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 13:46 -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 22:37:56 -0700 > Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > Thanks for the report. Would you mind posting the entire dmesg > > log, /proc/iomem contents, and "lspci -vv" output somewhere (maybe in > > bugzilla)? > > Done, new bug: > h

Re: Regression in i915 on 2.6.34-rc1

2010-03-14 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 23:40 -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 22:37:56 -0700 > Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > Thanks for the report. Would you mind posting the entire dmesg > > log, /proc/iomem contents, and "lspci -vv" output somewhere (maybe in > > bugzilla)? > > > > The quote belo

Re: Regression in i915 on 2.6.34-rc1

2010-03-13 Thread Pete Zaitcev
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 22:37:56 -0700 Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > Thanks for the report. Would you mind posting the entire dmesg > log, /proc/iomem contents, and "lspci -vv" output somewhere (maybe in > bugzilla)? Done, new bug: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15533 -- Pete ---

Re: Regression in i915 on 2.6.34-rc1

2010-03-13 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 22:37 -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 18:25 -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:33:58 -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > > > > I apologise for answering to myself, but while there was no answer, > > git bisect found the offending commit and I

Re: Regression in i915 on 2.6.34-rc1

2010-03-13 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 18:25 -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:33:58 -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > > I apologise for answering to myself, but while there was no answer, > git bisect found the offending commit and I verified that it was > the culprit. Also, I am adding Bjorn and Je

Re: Regression in i915 on 2.6.34-rc1

2010-03-12 Thread Pete Zaitcev
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 22:37:56 -0700 Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > Thanks for the report. Would you mind posting the entire dmesg > log, /proc/iomem contents, and "lspci -vv" output somewhere (maybe in > bugzilla)? > > The quote below isn't enough for me to see the problem, but > http://bugzilla.kernel.

Re: Regression in i915 on 2.6.34-rc1

2010-03-12 Thread Pete Zaitcev
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:33:58 -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote: I apologise for answering to myself, but while there was no answer, git bisect found the offending commit and I verified that it was the culprit. Also, I am adding Bjorn and Jesse to cc:. > I seem to hit a sudden regression in 2.6.34-rc1: t

Regression in i915 on 2.6.34-rc1

2010-03-10 Thread Pete Zaitcev
Dear Dave and others: I seem to hit a sudden regression in 2.6.34-rc1: the modeset fails. On this box it also means, no way to start X, which is unfortunate. Here's a quote from bad dmesg (truncated front and back for brievity): Linux agpgart interface v0.103 agpgart-intel :00:00.0: Intel HD