On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 12:41:21PM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 10/06/2007 07:42 AM, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> > This reverts commit f443675affe3f16dd428e46f0f7fd3f4d703eeab, which
> > breaks horribly if you aren't running an unreleased xf86-video-intel
> > driver out of git.
>
> I guess, this will
On 10/06/2007 09:29 PM, Keith Packard wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-10-06 at 08:59 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>> We do have a rule about "no regressions", so I think we'll have to do the
>> revert, but it would be nice to hear what the consequences for the revert
>> is for the affected hardware and
On 10/06/2007 07:42 AM, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> This reverts commit f443675affe3f16dd428e46f0f7fd3f4d703eeab, which
> breaks horribly if you aren't running an unreleased xf86-video-intel
> driver out of git.
I guess, this will break my graphics, no?
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/20/447
> Conflicts:
On Sat, 2007-10-06 at 08:59 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> We do have a rule about "no regressions", so I think we'll have to do the
> revert, but it would be nice to hear what the consequences for the revert
> is for the affected hardware and new X.org..
No regressions is more important than
On Sat, 6 Oct 2007, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>
> I guess, this will break my graphics, no?
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/20/447
Can you try it?
We do have a rule about "no regressions", so I think we'll have to do the
revert, but it would be nice to hear what the consequences for the revert
is for th
This reverts commit f443675affe3f16dd428e46f0f7fd3f4d703eeab, which
breaks horribly if you aren't running an unreleased xf86-video-intel
driver out of git.
Conflicts:
drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c
Signed-off-by: Kyle McMartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c |5 -
