On Wednesday 23 February 2005 12:37 pm, Patrick McFarland wrote:
> Unfortunately, yes. And several more have been flooded in the past few
> hours. However, I don't think banning Tor (or as lilo puts it, "Temporary
> ban") is the answer. It is not up to opers to ban Tor, because channels
> themselve
On Wednesday 23 February 2005 06:46, Patrick McFarland wrote:
> Do we want to use an IRC network that no longer supports freedom? Our only
> option is to move to another network, such as irc.noderebellion.net or
> irc.oftc.net
Congratulations, you win a free procmail rule!
- ajax
pgpE2NkdByiPU.
Patrick McFarland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> banned all Tor users from the FreeNode network.
Not good at all.
--
Esben Stien is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.esben-stien.name
irc://irc.esben-stien.name/%23contact
[sip|iax]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
On Wednesday 23 February 2005 11:15 am, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Patrick McFarland wrote:
> > Today lilo (the FreeNode network owner) has decided to make one step away
> > in a direction opposite of freedom, and banned all Tor users from the
> > FreeNode network.
> >
> > Tor ( http://tor.eff.org )
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Patrick McFarland wrote:
> Today lilo (the FreeNode network owner) has decided to make one step away in
> a
> direction opposite of freedom, and banned all Tor users from the FreeNode
> network.
>
> Tor ( http://tor.eff.org ) is an open source anon
Today lilo (the FreeNode network owner) has decided to make one step away in a
direction opposite of freedom, and banned all Tor users from the FreeNode
network.
Tor ( http://tor.eff.org ) is an open source anonymous gateway system. Many
users who are not in the position to be able to use IRC o
