While investigating rare Xserver (errno=22 in select) and X client
(losing X connection) crashes that seem to be related to the new
linux-core drm I found this in savage_dri.c and several other DDX
drivers:
...driverSwapMethod = DRI_HIDE_X_CONTEXT;
This seems to indicate that the Xserver is so
Felix Kühling wrote:
While investigating rare Xserver (errno=22 in select) and X client
(losing X connection) crashes that seem to be related to the new
linux-core drm I found this in savage_dri.c and several other DDX
drivers:
...driverSwapMethod = DRI_HIDE_X_CONTEXT;
This seems to indicate tha
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 10:13:50 +0100, Keith Whitwell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Felix Kühling wrote:
> I think the reason that you are experiencing failures is because the X server
> is trying to read or poll the drm filehandle, but Jon has recently changed the
> behaviour of that filehandle to ret
Jon Smirl wrote:
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 10:13:50 +0100, Keith Whitwell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Felix Kühling wrote:
I think the reason that you are experiencing failures is because the X server
is trying to read or poll the drm filehandle, but Jon has recently changed the
behaviour of that filehand
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:39:27 +0100, Keith Whitwell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, it's not really an unimplemented poll() function, but the
> backwards-compatible ghost of a real communications channel which is still
> polled, but never written to.
One way to fix this would be to alternately ret
I just changed DRM to alternative between zero and POLLIN This
will make the DRM poll() function work like the kernel expects it to
and still work with existing X servers. Can someone please get this
incorrect code out of the X server?
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:39:27 +0100, Keith Whitwell
<[EMAIL
Am Mi, den 13.10.2004 schrieb Jon Smirl um 18:53:
> I just changed DRM to alternative between zero and POLLIN This
> will make the DRM poll() function work like the kernel expects it to
> and still work with existing X servers. Can someone please get this
> incorrect code out of the X server?
Felix Kühling wrote:
Am Mi, den 13.10.2004 schrieb Jon Smirl um 18:53:
I just changed DRM to alternative between zero and POLLIN This
will make the DRM poll() function work like the kernel expects it to
and still work with existing X servers. Can someone please get this
incorrect code out of th
On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 19:42 +0200, Felix KÃhling wrote:
> Am Mi, den 13.10.2004 schrieb Jon Smirl um 18:53:
> > I just changed DRM to alternative between zero and POLLIN This
> > will make the DRM poll() function work like the kernel expects it to
> > and still work with existing X servers. Can
Am Mi, den 13.10.2004 schrieb Michel Dänzer um 22:57:
> On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 19:42 +0200, Felix Kühling wrote:
> > Am Mi, den 13.10.2004 schrieb Jon Smirl um 18:53:
> > > I just changed DRM to alternative between zero and POLLIN This
> > > will make the DRM poll() function work like the kernel
Jon Smirl wrote:
I just changed DRM to alternative between zero and POLLIN This
will make the DRM poll() function work like the kernel expects it to
and still work with existing X servers. Can someone please get this
incorrect code out of the X server?
I got some mysterious server crashes since
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 15:11:26 +0200, Roland Scheidegger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jon Smirl wrote:
> > I just changed DRM to alternative between zero and POLLIN This
> > will make the DRM poll() function work like the kernel expects it to
> > and still work with existing X servers. Can someon
12 matches
Mail list logo
