Anyone tested it on SMP yet? I think the mga driver is dodgy the others
seem okay but until someone with an MGA/SMP/preempt does it ... I'm not
sure about it..
Dave.
On Sun, 29 Aug 2004, Jon Smirl wrote:
> This change is not going to break a non-SMP system but it may break an
> SMP one. This n
Read my comment at the end where iritations not time should be passed to
this macro. The time we set is allways '1'.
--- Francois Romieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike Mestnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
> [DRM_UDELAY patch]
>
> Does actually a DRM_UDELAY(d) with d > 100 appear somewhere in the
>
Mike Mestnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[DRM_UDELAY patch]
Does actually a DRM_UDELAY(d) with d > 100 appear somewhere in the sources ?
--
Ueimor
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
This change is not going to break a non-SMP system but it may break an
SMP one. This needs to be tested on a SMP system before it can be
committed. I thought the reports were that it breaks on SMP.
--- Mike Mestnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Coulden't cause DRI/DRM to break on my non-SMP radeo
Coulden't cause DRI/DRM to break on my non-SMP radeon preempt system.
Could this be commited, in one form or another?
cvs diff: Diffing .
Index: drm_os_linux.h
===
RCS file: /cvs/dri/drm/linux/drm_os_linux.h,v
retrieving revision 1.2
