Re: i830 driver status..

2004-07-19 Thread Adam Jackson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 19 July 2004 16:41, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 13:29:27 -0700, Eric Anholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I'm thinking maybe we don't want to use a branch. Here's the idea: We > > make the DevelDRIDrivers define in imake i

Re: i830 driver status..

2004-07-19 Thread Alex Deucher
> >>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > > > >>X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >>Subject: Re: i830 driver status.. > > > >> > > > >>On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 08:22:42 +0100 (IST), Dav

Re: i830 driver status..

2004-07-19 Thread Eric Anholt
Jul 2004 09:06:26 -0400 > > >>From: Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >>To: Dave Airlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > > >>X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >

Re: i830 driver status..

2004-07-19 Thread Alex Deucher
; >>To: Dave Airlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > >>X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Subject: Re: i830 driver status.. > >> > >>On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 08:22:42 +0100 (IS

Re: i830 driver status..

2004-07-19 Thread Keith Whitwell
Mike A. Harris wrote: On Fri, 16 Jul 2004, Alex Deucher wrote: Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 09:06:26 -0400 From: Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Dave Airlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re:

Re: i830 driver status..

2004-07-16 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004, Alex Deucher wrote: >Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 09:06:26 -0400 >From: Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: Dave Airlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII >X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subjec

Re: i830 driver status..

2004-07-16 Thread Eric Anholt
On Fri, 2004-07-16 at 06:06, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 08:22:42 +0100 (IST), Dave Airlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Is the i830 driver considered to be dead, should any future work go > > towards the i915 one? > > > > just like to get a semi-official idea? if so we need to

Re: i830 driver status..

2004-07-16 Thread Alex Deucher
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 08:22:42 +0100 (IST), Dave Airlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is the i830 driver considered to be dead, should any future work go > towards the i915 one? > > just like to get a semi-official idea? if so we need to import the up to > date DDX into the DRI tree and start rele

Re: i830 driver status..

2004-07-16 Thread Alan Hourihane
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 08:22:42AM +0100, Dave Airlie wrote: > Is the i830 driver considered to be dead, should any future work go > towards the i915 one? I think you can deem the i830 driver dead, and the i915 superceeds it. All future work should go to the i915 driver. Alan.

i830 driver status..

2004-07-16 Thread Dave Airlie
Is the i830 driver considered to be dead, should any future work go towards the i915 one? just like to get a semi-official idea? if so we need to import the up to date DDX into the DRI tree and start releasing the snapshots for the i915 driver.. I'm bringing over some fixes for the i915 from the