Re: kernel modesetting progress report....

2008-02-29 Thread Alex Deucher
Sorry, mouse went wonky for a second there. On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 2:59 AM, Johannes Engel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What did you want to say, Alex? I only got the quotes. ;) Greetings, Johannes - This SF.net email is

Re: kernel modesetting progress report....

2008-02-28 Thread Maarten Maathuis
On 2/28/08, Dave Airlie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So just to let people know where kernel modesetting is getting to and what I'm up to with it.. So I really want to ship something in Fedora 9 with kernel modesetting in it, whether this is a default or a special boot option for the user I

Re: kernel modesetting progress report....

2008-02-28 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:53:46 +1000 Dave Airlie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So just to let people know where kernel modesetting is getting to and what I'm up to with it.. So I really want to ship something in Fedora 9 with kernel modesetting in it, whether this is a default or a special boot

Re: kernel modesetting progress report....

2008-02-28 Thread Alex Deucher
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 1:53 AM, Dave Airlie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So just to let people know where kernel modesetting is getting to and what I'm up to with it.. So I really want to ship something in Fedora 9 with kernel modesetting in it, whether this is a default or a special boot

Re: kernel modesetting progress report....

2008-02-28 Thread Maarten Maathuis
On 2/28/08, Dave Airlie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So just to let people know where kernel modesetting is getting to and what I'm up to with it.. So I really want to ship something in Fedora 9 with kernel modesetting in it, whether this is a default or a special boot option for the user I

Fwd: kernel modesetting progress report....

2008-02-28 Thread Jakob Bornecrantz
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Jerome Glisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:53:46 +1000 Dave Airlie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So just to let people know where kernel modesetting is getting to and what I'm up to with it.. So I really want to ship something

Re: kernel modesetting progress report....

2008-02-28 Thread Dave Airlie
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 1:36 AM, Alex Deucher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 1:53 AM, Dave Airlie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So just to let people know where kernel modesetting is getting to and what I'm up to with it.. So I really want to ship something in Fedora 9

Re: kernel modesetting progress report....

2008-02-28 Thread Dave Airlie
Please don't let any api freezing depend on fedora core, at least give external parties time to play with it once it's reasonably stable, this will undoubtely reveal limitations. It should be in mainline drm well before api freezing it. It's not called Fedora core any more :), but I

Re: kernel modesetting progress report....

2008-02-28 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Thursday, February 28, 2008 5:36 am Jerome Glisse wrote: Dave there is one things that is needed to be redone: frame buffer creation handling. And i would like we not freeze the API until we had some time to play with it a bit. So i guess my question is does this means modesetting API get

Re: kernel modesetting progress report....

2008-02-28 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Thursday, February 28, 2008 11:33 am Dave Airlie wrote: the current API abstracts connectors from outputs, so in reality it is encoders with connector properties at the moment. you define a connector type and a connector id for each output and can gang them together.. so wrt to the

Re: kernel modesetting progress report....

2008-02-28 Thread Maarten Maathuis
On 2/28/08, Dave Airlie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please don't let any api freezing depend on fedora core, at least give external parties time to play with it once it's reasonably stable, this will undoubtely reveal limitations. It should be in mainline drm well before api freezing

Re: Fwd: kernel modesetting progress report....

2008-02-28 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 19:12:07 +0100 Jakob Bornecrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm guessing a flag system could be used, sorta like the BO flags. There are some things to consider: should we allow driver dependant flags on it or should those be exposed in a driver specific ioctl.

Re: kernel modesetting progress report....

2008-02-28 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:48:55 -0800 Jesse Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday, February 28, 2008 5:36 am Jerome Glisse wrote: Dave there is one things that is needed to be redone: frame buffer creation handling. And i would like we not freeze the API until we had some time to play

Re: kernel modesetting progress report....

2008-02-28 Thread Maarten Maathuis
On 2/28/08, Jesse Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday, February 28, 2008 11:33 am Dave Airlie wrote: the current API abstracts connectors from outputs, so in reality it is encoders with connector properties at the moment. you define a connector type and a connector id for each

Re: kernel modesetting progress report....

2008-02-28 Thread Dave Airlie
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 8:26 AM, Maarten Maathuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2/28/08, Jesse Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday, February 28, 2008 11:33 am Dave Airlie wrote: the current API abstracts connectors from outputs, so in reality it is encoders with connector

Re: kernel modesetting progress report....

2008-02-28 Thread Alex Deucher
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Jerome Glisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:48:55 -0800 Jesse Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday, February 28, 2008 5:36 am Jerome Glisse wrote: Dave there is one things that is needed to be redone: frame buffer creation

kernel modesetting progress report....

2008-02-27 Thread Dave Airlie
So just to let people know where kernel modesetting is getting to and what I'm up to with it.. So I really want to ship something in Fedora 9 with kernel modesetting in it, whether this is a default or a special boot option for the user I won't decide for a while. But with this in mind I've