r200 comment.. shock rifle issue..

2004-10-01 Thread Dave Airlie
from r200_texstate.c:1340 maybe needs to be done pairwise due to 2 parallel (physical) tex units ? looks like that's not the case, if 8500/9100 owners don't complain remove this... Anyone want to bet this has something to do with the shock rifle.. probably not but the comment stood out

Re: r200 comment.. shock rifle issue..

2004-10-02 Thread Roland Scheidegger
Dave Airlie wrote: from r200_texstate.c:1340 maybe needs to be done pairwise due to 2 parallel (physical) tex units ? looks like that's not the case, if 8500/9100 owners don't complain remove this... Anyone want to bet this has something to do with the shock rifle.. probably not but the c

Re: r200 comment.. shock rifle issue..

2004-10-02 Thread Marcello Maggioni
On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 03:49:16 +0100 (IST), Dave Airlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > from r200_texstate.c:1340 > > maybe needs to be done pairwise due to 2 parallel (physical) tex units ? > looks like that's not the case, if 8500/9100 owners don't > complain remove this... > > Anyone wa