On Sunday 21 August 2005 07:55 pm, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
And so on, through /dev/dri/card254
Mind you, /dev/dri/card0 exists:
[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] - ~ ]: ls -la /dev/dri
total 1
dr-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 21 18:37 .
dr-xr-xr-x 5 root wheel 512 Dec 31 1969
I would expect a difference, but, it might have changed..
FYI, FreeBSD -CURRENT does not use fixed major number any more. It's
dynamically assigned when it's created.
Cool ! Is this more devfs style (with kernel space code) or udevd style
(with userspace code) ?
Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
And so on, through /dev/dri/card254
Mind you, /dev/dri/card0 exists:
[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] - ~ ]: ls -la /dev/dri
total 1
dr-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 21 18:37 .
dr-xr-xr-x 5 root wheel 512 Dec 31 1969 ..
crw-rw-rw- 1 root wheel0, 162 Aug 21
On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 13:54 -0400, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
I would expect a difference, but, it might have changed..
FYI, FreeBSD -CURRENT does not use fixed major number any more. It's
dynamically assigned when it's created.
Cool ! Is this more devfs style (with kernel space code)
On Monday 22 August 2005 01:54 pm, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
I would expect a difference, but, it might have changed..
FYI, FreeBSD -CURRENT does not use fixed major number any more.
It's dynamically assigned when it's created.
Cool ! Is this more devfs style (with kernel space code) or
On Monday 22 August 2005 02:49 pm, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
And so on, through /dev/dri/card254
Mind you, /dev/dri/card0 exists:
[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] - ~ ]: ls -la /dev/dri
total 1
dr-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 21 18:37 .
dr-xr-xr-x 5 root wheel
Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Monday 22 August 2005 02:49 pm, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
And so on, through /dev/dri/card254
Mind you, /dev/dri/card0 exists:
[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] - ~ ]: ls -la /dev/dri
total 1
dr-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 21 18:37 .
On Monday 22 August 2005 03:53 pm, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Monday 22 August 2005 02:49 pm, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
And so on, through /dev/dri/card254
Mind you, /dev/dri/card0 exists:
[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] - ~ ]: ls -la /dev/dri
total 1
Jung-uk Kim wrote:
It seems you built DRM from DRI CVS, right?
Yep. Is that not the correct way to do it these days?
Can you try the following
patch and do the test again?
http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/fbsd_vs_drm-20050818.diff
That patched solved my problems. I now have DRI
On Monday 22 August 2005 06:23 pm, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
Jung-uk Kim wrote:
It seems you built DRM from DRI CVS, right?
Yep. Is that not the correct way to do it these days?
:-) It IS the correct way. However DRI CVS is not always stable, at
least for FreeBSD. More stable version
I'm curious if anyone has gotten r300 working on FreeBSD now that the
driver has been merged with Mesa and the DRM cvs tree?
I managed to get Mesa CVS to build on FreeBSD with some help from Adam
Jackson and Daniel Stone on irc today. DRM from the cvs tree compiled
as well. The kernel
And so on, through /dev/dri/card254
Mind you, /dev/dri/card0 exists:
[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] - ~ ]: ls -la /dev/dri
total 1
dr-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 21 18:37 .
dr-xr-xr-x 5 root wheel 512 Dec 31 1969 ..
crw-rw-rw- 1 root wheel0, 162 Aug 21 18:35 card0
Any ideas?
Is
12 matches
Mail list logo
