Re: r300.sf.net lockup

2004-11-05 Thread Pat Suwalski
Nicolai Haehnle wrote: 4. Your card has 256MB memory while I can only test with 128MB. Has anybody successfully experimented in any way (r300_demo or r300_driver) with 256MB cards? I remember seeing that the large memory versions had some paging hacks, and there might be related differences that

Re: r300.sf.net lockup

2004-11-05 Thread Alex Deucher
On Fri, 5 Nov 2004 15:17:09 +0100, Nicolai Haehnle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > > > On Saturday 06 November 2004 01:04, Ben Skeggs wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I've been trying to get the experimental r300.sf.net driver to work on > > my machine. I've compiled and installed it ok, but ever

Re: r300.sf.net lockup

2004-11-05 Thread Lars Roland
On Fri, 5 Nov 2004 15:17:09 +0100, Nicolai Haehnle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 4. Your card has 256MB memory while I can only test with 128MB. Has anybody > successfully experimented in any way (r300_demo or r300_driver) with 256MB > cards? I have tested the driver with xorg cvs on a 256MB creati

Re: r300.sf.net lockup

2004-11-05 Thread Nicolai Haehnle
Hi, On Saturday 06 November 2004 01:04, Ben Skeggs wrote: > Hello, > > I've been trying to get the experimental r300.sf.net driver to work on > my machine. I've compiled and installed it ok, but everytime I start > the X server with DRI enabled, the top of the screen is corrupted, which > I'm as

r300.sf.net lockup

2004-11-05 Thread Ben Skeggs
Hello, I've been trying to get the experimental r300.sf.net driver to work on my machine. I've compiled and installed it ok, but everytime I start the X server with DRI enabled, the top of the screen is corrupted, which I'm assuming is the xterms that are supposed to be showing. However, the mous