Add __user macro to the function declarations that accept userspace pointers as
arguments.
Signed-off-by: Anh Le anhlq2...@gmail.com
---
.../staging/lustre/lustre/include/lprocfs_status.h | 6 +--
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/lproc_llite.c | 48 +++---
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 11:39:00PM +, Long Li wrote:
Thanks Sitsofe. Can you provide more details on the test setup?
The kernel trace shows that skb-mac_header=0x (which means not
yet set, it's in RCX: ).
See reply below.
-Original Message-
From: devel
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 09:41:34PM +0200, jes.soren...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Jes Sorensen jes.soren...@redhat.com
We don't do anything with these, so get rid of them
Signed-off-by: Jes Sorensen jes.soren...@redhat.com
---
drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_xmit.c| 6 --
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 05:32:49AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 09:41:34PM +0200, jes.soren...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Jes Sorensen jes.soren...@redhat.com
We don't do anything with these, so get rid of them
Signed-off-by: Jes Sorensen jes.soren...@redhat.com
---
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 08:49:01AM +0100, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
Microsoft Hyper-V virtual disks currently only claim SPC-2 compliance
even though they implement post SPC-2 features (such as thin
provisioning) which means the Linux kernel does not go on to test for
those features even though
On Sat, 2014-10-11 at 10:39 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 08:49:01AM +0100, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
Microsoft Hyper-V virtual disks currently only claim SPC-2 compliance
even though they implement post SPC-2 features (such as thin
provisioning) which means the Linux
-Original Message-
From: James Bottomley [mailto:james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com]
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2014 10:42 AM
To: Christoph Hellwig
Cc: Sitsofe Wheeler; KY Srinivasan; Haiyang Zhang; Christoph Hellwig; Hannes
Reinecke; linux-s...@vger.kernel.org;
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 08:13:42PM +0100, Filipe Gonçalves wrote:
This patch fixes a sparse warning on layout.c (ptlrpc) that was caused by
having preprocessor directives in the arguments to a macro.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Gonçalves fil...@codinghighway.com
---
On the current release of Windows (windows 10), we are advertising SPC3
compliance.
We are ok with declaring compliance to SPC3 in our drivers.
If you are going to declare SPC3 compliance in the drivers, are you going to
put in
checks to ensure that SPC-3 compliance doesn't get accidentally
From: Filipe Gonçalves fil...@codinghighway.com
Given that this code is now part of the kernel tree, the #ifdef directive
comparing LUSTRE_VERSION_CODE to the kernel version is no longer needed.
As a side effect, this will also remove the sparse error directive in argument
list.
Hello!
No, it's not the way to test the kernel version, it's the way to test
internal
lustre version.
Either way maintaining compatibility with Lustre 1.8 and 2.0 servers should
not
be important anymore, so it's fine to drop this check indeed.
Bye,
Oleg
On Oct 11, 2014, at 5:06
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Leung [mailto:jle...@v10networks.ca]
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2014 1:22 PM
To: KY Srinivasan; James Bottomley; Christoph Hellwig
Cc: Sitsofe Wheeler; Haiyang Zhang; Christoph Hellwig; Hannes Reinecke;
linux-s...@vger.kernel.org;
Hi,
Oops.. sorry for the mess then. I am still trying to get to know the
codebase. I submitted a new patch where I removed the check.
Thanks for your patience :)
Best,
Filipe
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Drokin, Oleg oleg.dro...@intel.com wrote:
Hello!
No, it's not the way to test
Old version of lustre (1.8) calculated RPC checksums differently,
but the compat code is no longer important since in-kernel
version of lustre is nto compatible with 1.8 lustre servers
(that are long deprecated too).
Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin gr...@linuxhacker.ru
---
Nobody should be using any fo the old lustre 1.8 era tools
anymore, so drop compatibility with those.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin gr...@linuxhacker.ru
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/dir.c | 58 --
.../staging/lustre/lustre/llite/llite_internal.h | 18
These three patches remove support for code that is no longer needed.
Mostly ability to talk to old version of lustre clients and servers.
Oleg Drokin (3):
staging/lustre/ptlrpc: get rid of lustre 1.8 compatible checksums
staging/lustre: get rid of deprecaed acl mount option code
This is long since unused code, so get rid of it.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin gr...@linuxhacker.ru
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/llite_lib.c | 19 ---
1 file changed, 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/llite_lib.c
17 matches
Mail list logo
