[PATCH] Staging: fbtft: fbtft-core: Removed unnecessary checks

The driver core clears the driver data to NULL after device_release or on probe failure. Signed-off-by: Nizam Haider --- drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c | 4 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c index b1e451

Dear Friend

Dear Friend, I am interested in establishing and operating a very viable business as a means of investment abroad. I do not know too well on how this is done in your country, so I will need you to help me in this regard. My preference is any good profit yielding business and I would appreciat

Re: [PATCH 06/40] staging: lustre: remove uses of IS_ERR_VALUE()

On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 06:35:42PM -0500, James Simmons wrote: > @@ -1577,15 +1578,20 @@ static int mdc_ioc_changelog_send(struct obd_device > *obd, >* New thread because we should return to user app before >* writing into our pipe >*/ > - rc = PTR_ERR(kthread_run(mdc_c

[PATCH] staging: rts5208: Removed blank lines

Removed multiple blank lines to avoid the check detected by checkpatch.pl. CHECK: Please don't use multiple blank lines Signed-off-by: Anjali Menon --- drivers/staging/rts5208/spi.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/rts5208/spi.c b/drivers/staging/rts5208/spi.

Re: HFI1 code duplication todo

On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 01:25:23AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 10:41:16AM -0500, Doug Ledford wrote: > > So, as to the hfi1/qib/rxe transport library. The qib driver is in the > > rdma tree, and we aren't going to move it to staging just because it > > depends on somethin

Re: [PATCH] staging:rtl8192e: Usage count off by one

On 16.11.2015 01:51, Sean MacLennan wrote: > The rtllib driver is not calling try_module_get() when loading the > encryption modules. Because of this, you can never remove the module > once you have used it one (i.e. bring up the wireless interface). > > Signed-off-by: Sean MacLennan Tested-by: M

Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: lov: Fix sparse warning

Hello! On Nov 21, 2015, at 3:26 AM, Paul Davies C wrote: > This patch fixes the following warnings:- > > drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_object.c:926:22: warning: symbol > 'lov_lsm_get' was not declared. Should it be static? > drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_object.c:942:6: warning:

[PATCH] staging: vt6656: fix definitions of DEVICE_FLAGS_* flags

test_bit and set_bit take the bit number to operate on, rather than a mask. This patch fixes the DEVICE_FLAGS_* definitions so that they represent the bit index in priv->flags as opposed to the mask returned by the BIT macro. Signed-off-by: Alexey Tulia --- drivers/staging/vt6656/device.h | 4 ++

[PATCH] staging: rts5208: Remove unnecessary synchronize_irq() before free_irq()

Calling synchronize_irq() right before free_irq() is quite useless. On one hand the IRQ can easily fire again before free_irq() is entered, on the other hand free_irq() itself calls synchronize_irq() internally (in a race condition free way), before any state associated with the IRQ is freed. Patc

[PATCH] staging: rtl8188eu: remove an extra space

drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_wlan_util.c:1377 check_assoc_AP() warn: inconsistent indenting Signed-off-by: Alexey Tulia --- drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_wlan_util.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_wlan_util.c b/

[PATCH] staging: lustre: lov: Fix sparse warning

This patch fixes the following warnings:- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_object.c:926:22: warning: symbol 'lov_lsm_get' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_object.c:942:6: warning: symbol 'lov_lsm_put' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed