2020-01-12 2:56 GMT+09:00, Greg KH :
> On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 09:14:19PM +0900, Namjae Jeon wrote:
>> From: Namjae Jeon
>>
>> Make staging/exfat and fs/exfat mutually exclusive to select the one
>> between two same filesystem.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Amir G
From: Namjae Jeon
Make staging/exfat and fs/exfat mutually exclusive to select the one
between two same filesystem.
Suggested-by: Amir Goldstein
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon
---
drivers/staging/exfat/Kconfig | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging
Add STAGING prefix to config names to avoid collsion with fs/exfat config.
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon
---
drivers/staging/Makefile | 2 +-
drivers/staging/exfat/Kconfig| 26 +++
drivers/staging/exfat/Makefile | 2 +-
drivers/staging/exfat/exfat.h
> [..]
> > Put it in drivers/staging/sdfat/.
> >
> > But really we want someone from Samsung to say that they will treat
> > the staging version as upstream. It doesn't work when people apply
> > fixes to their version and a year later back port the fixes into
> > staging. The staging tree is
[..]
> Put it in drivers/staging/sdfat/.
>
> But really we want someone from Samsung to say that they will treat
> the staging version as upstream. It doesn't work when people apply
> fixes to their version and a year later back port the fixes into
> staging. The staging tree is going to have
I've summarized some of the big differences between sdfat and exfat
in linux-next.
1. sdfat has been refactored to improve compatibility, readability and
to be linux friendly.(included support mass storages larger than 2TB.)
2. sdfat has been optimized for the performance of SD-cards.
-
We are excited to see this happening and would like to state that we appreciate
time and
effort which people put into upstreaming exfat. Thank you!
However, if possible, can we step back a little bit and re-consider it? We
would prefer to
see upstream the code which we are currently using in our
