On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 04:00:30PM -0700, Steve Longerbeam wrote:
>
>
> On 8/14/19 3:04 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 12:04:41PM -0700, Steve Longerbeam wrote:
> > >
> > > On 8/14/19 3:30 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux ad
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 12:04:41PM -0700, Steve Longerbeam wrote:
>
>
> On 8/14/19 3:30 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 09:53:41AM -0700, Steve Longerbeam wrote:
> > > The full patchset doesn't seem to be up yet, but see [
On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 09:53:41AM -0700, Steve Longerbeam wrote:
> The full patchset doesn't seem to be up yet, but see [1] for the cover
> letter.
Was the entire series copied to the mailing lists, or just selected
patches? I only saw 4, 9, 11 and 13-22 via lakml.
In the absence of the other p
I just did this:
rmmod imx-media
modprobe imx-media
and was greeted by the below kernel messages. I don't think this has
been the first issue I found with the iMX media stuff involving a module
unload/reload cycle - may I suggest that this is added to the testing
regime for this code? Thanks.
On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 11:17:31AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-07-09 at 22:04 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > These GENMASK uses are inverted argument order and the
> > actual masks produced are incorrect. Fix them.
> >
> > Add checkpatch tests to help avoid more misuses too.
> >
>
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 01:10:02PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Add a structure for the parameters of dma_buf_attach, this makes it much
> easier
> to add new parameters later on.
I don't understand this reasoning. What are the "new parameters" that
are being proposed, and why do we need to p
