Hello,
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 08:35:10AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 01:35:21PM -0400, Cathy Avery wrote:
> > + /*
> > +* Set the error handler work queue.
> > +*/
> > + snprintf(host_dev->work_q_name, sizeof(host_dev->work_q_name),
> > +
rantee unless the target CPU is explicitly specified and thus the
> increase of local concurrency shouldn't make any difference.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bhaktipriya Shridhar <bhaktipriy...@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <t...@kernel.org>
Thanks.
--
tejun
___
Hello,
On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 02:14:23PM +0530, Bhaktipriya Shridhar wrote:
> alloc_workqueue replaces deprecated create_workqueue().
> A dedicated workqueue has been used since the workitem (viz >work,
> which maps to vmbus_onmessage_work), is engaged in normal device
> operation which involves
ght by the time exit path runs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bhaktipriya Shridhar <bhaktipriy...@gmail.com>
For the workqueue part,
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <t...@kernel.org>
Thanks.
--
tejun
___
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://d
Hello,
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 01:39:07AM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
I fully agree with the points Shuah brought up here. I don't think it is
a good idea to add this kind of resource management to runtime-allocated
(and de-allocated) resources of device drivers.
Also DMA handles are not
Hello,
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 08:54:09AM +0300, Eli Billauer wrote:
That seems OK to me, but the problem I'm concerned with is this: In
devm_get_free_pages() it says
devres = devres_alloc(devm_pages_release,
sizeof(struct pages_devres), GFP_KERNEL);
if
Hello, Eli.
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 03:19:21PM +0300, Eli Billauer wrote:
+ if (dma_mapping_error(dev, dma_handle)) {
+ devres_free(dr);
+ return 0;
Can't we just keep returning dma_handle? Even if that means invoking
-mapping_error() twice? It's yucky to have subtly
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 11:26:35AM +0300, Eli Billauer wrote:
devm_get_free_pages() and devm_free_pages() are the managed counterparts
for __get_free_pages() and free_pages().
Signed-off-by: Eli Billauer eli.billa...@gmail.com
Acked-by: Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org
Thanks.
--
tejun
Hello,
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 11:26:36AM +0300, Eli Billauer wrote:
+dma_addr_t dmam_map_single(struct device *dev, void *ptr, size_t size,
+enum dma_data_direction direction)
+
+{
+ struct dma_devres *dr;
+ dma_addr_t dma_handle;
+
+ dr =
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 11:26:37AM +0300, Eli Billauer wrote:
Signed-off-by: Eli Billauer eli.billa...@gmail.com
---
Documentation/driver-model/devres.txt |2 ++
include/asm-generic/pci-dma-compat.h | 17 +
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
The patch
direct write accesses to using the correct API.
Signed-off-by: Russell King rmk+ker...@arm.linux.org.uk
Acked-by: Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org
The patch is pretty widely spread. I don't mind how it gets routed
but what's the plan?
Thanks.
--
tejun
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 07:16:52AM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote:
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 12:11:38AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
The correct way for a driver to specify the coherent DMA mask is
not to directly access the field in the struct device, but to use
dma_set_coherent_mask(). Only arch
Hey,
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 03:00:18PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
Another would be if subsystem maintainers are happy that I carry them,
I can add the acks, and then later on towards the end of the cycle,
provide a branch subsystem maintainers could pull.
Or... if you can think
13 matches
Mail list logo
