Re: [PATCH] staging: speakup: separate 80+ chars lines.

2018-04-19 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 03:47:10AM -0300, Andrew Jye Shih Chuang wrote: > Increase readability of code following the Kernel coding style by breaking > long lines and thus eliminating the checkpatch.pl warning. > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Jye Shih Chuang > --- > drivers/staging/speakup/main.c | 15

Re: [PATCH v3] misc: Move panel driver out of staging

2016-02-02 Thread Willy Tarreau
pt it. Sorry for the delay, still trying to catch up with my e-mails. Acked-by: Willy Tarreau Thanks, willy ___ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Re: [PATCH] Revert "Staging: panel: usleep_range is preferred over udelay"

2016-01-25 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 06:19:44PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 03:40:41PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > Ying, could you CC the subsystem list for these reports? This one was > > CC'd to Sirnam, Greg and LKML. Sirnam is too new to understand what > > they mean, Greg i

Re: [PATCH] Staging: panel: Fix sparse warnings (line length, space after a cast) in panel.c

2016-01-20 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hello Arthur, On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 03:09:20PM -0600, Arthur Marble wrote: > This patch fixes 'Lines longer than 80 columns' and 'No space is necessary > after > a cast' warnings in /drivers/staging/panel/panel.c. Thank you but this one has already been proposed twice and I think the last one

Re: [PATCH 5/5] Staging: panel: Make statement more readable

2016-01-01 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Ksenija, several points, see below. On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 09:11:03PM +0100, Ksenija Stanojevic wrote: > Broke statement into 3 different lines to make it more readable. > > Signeded-off-by: Ksenija Stanojevic ^^ Extra "ed". Don't waste your time typing it by hand, several git comma

Re: [PATCH 3/5] Staging: panel: Remove ULL

2015-12-29 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 03:59:26PM -0500, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Ksenija Stanojevic > wrote: > > Remove ULL since it's useless. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ksenija Stanojevic > > --- > > drivers/staging/panel/panel.c | 12 ++-- > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+

Re: Move panel driver out of staging?

2015-12-28 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Dan, Thanks for your review, I'm adding a few extra comments below. On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 06:27:36PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 12:32:39PM +0100, Ksenija Stanojevi?? wrote: > > Hi Willy, > > > > I'm helping Greg do a bit of cleanup in the staging tree, I noticed t

Re: Move panel driver out of staging?

2015-12-28 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Ksenija, On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 12:32:39PM +0100, Ksenija Stanojevi?? wrote: > Hi Willy, > > I'm helping Greg do a bit of cleanup in the staging tree, I noticed that > panel driver is maybe ready to be moved to drivers/misc. I think so as well, we discussed this with Greg 6 months ago or so

Re: [PATCH 1/1] staging: coding style cleanups for staging/panel driver

2015-12-18 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 11:55:13AM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 08:01:58AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 02:48:58PM +0530, Bijosh T wrote: > > > From: Bijosh T > > > > > > This patch fixes coding style errors for staging/panel driver. > > > > > > Si

[PATCH] staging: update panel driver's author address

2015-12-18 Thread Willy Tarreau
I'm realizing that I sometimes miss e-mails sent to my old address, so better update it. Since I only have the relevant hardware at my work place, let's use this address so that I can test code if needed. Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau --- MAINTAINERS| 2 +- drivers/sta

Re: [PATCH 1/1] staging: coding style cleanups for staging/panel driver

2015-12-18 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 02:48:58PM +0530, Bijosh T wrote: > From: Bijosh T > > This patch fixes coding style errors for staging/panel driver. > > Signed-off-by: Bijosh T Acked-by: Willy Tarreau Thanks Bijosh, Willy ___ devel

Re: [PATCH] Staging: panel: Fixed a spacing after cast coding style issue

2015-11-11 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 07:35:30PM +0100, Daniel H. Hemmingsen wrote: > Fixed a spacing after cast coding style issue. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel H. Hemmingsen Acked-by: Willy Tarreau Thanks, Willy ___ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverpr

Re: [PATCH] staging: panel: panel.c: Fixed coding style issues

2015-08-27 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 09:02:46PM +0530, nayeem wrote: > From: Nayeemahmed Badebade > > Fixed warnings reported by checkpatch.pl: > - Block comments use a trailing */ on a separate line > - Block comments use * on subsequent lines > > Signed-off-by: Nayeemahmed Badeb

Re: [PATCH] staging: panel: Fix coding style issue.

2015-08-05 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 10:43:23PM +0300, Lior Pugatch wrote: > This patch fixes checkpatch.pl warning, > all warnings are releted to comments code style. Acked-by: Willy Tarreau Thanks! Willy ___ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.or

Re: [PATCH] staging: panel: use schedule_timeout_interruptible()

2015-05-29 Thread Willy Tarreau
ies which handles all > corner-cases correctly, was used. > > Patch was compile tested with x86_64_defconfig + CONFIG_STAGING=y, > CONFIG_PARPORT=m, CONFIG_PANEL=m > > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire Acked-by: Willy Tarreau > --- > Patch is against 4.1-rc5 (localversion-nex

Re: [PATCH 6/6] MAINTAINERS: maintain parport

2015-05-20 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 05:46:44PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: > On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Sudip Mukherjee > wrote: > > Lets give the parport subsystem a proper name and start > > maintaining the files. > > Excuse me, but usually someone takes over the maintainer role after > proving

Re: [RFC PATCH] checkpatch: check for 2 or more spaces around assignment of a declaration

2015-05-20 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 06:02:06PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > Perhaps space aligned declarations should have some > checkpatch --strict warning for 2 or more spaces > around any assignment of the declaration. > > int a = 1;// 2+ spaces before = > int b = 2;

Re: [PATCH] staging: panel: fix stackdump

2015-05-11 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 04:42:19PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > if we load the module, unload and then again try to load the module, we > will get a stackdump. In the module_exit function we are unregistering > the device and releasing the parport. So when we reach the detach > function parport

Re: [PATCH 01/14] parport: return value of attach and parport_register_driver

2015-04-08 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 03:27:37PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 05:20:10PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 02:38:32PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > > 1) We can't apply this patch on its own so this way of breaking up the > > > patches doesn't wor

Re: [PATCH] staging: panel: remove duplicate code

2015-04-07 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 07:51:17PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 04:14:59PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > Not-so-old laptops used to have parport connectors for a while, and can be > > found at a very cheap price or even for free by now with dead ba

Re: [PATCH] staging: panel: remove duplicate code

2015-04-07 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 12:12:06PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 03:26:58PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 11:44:29AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 02:55:02PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 0

Re: [PATCH v3] staging: panel: fix lcd type

2015-03-24 Thread Willy Tarreau
D204A lcd with LCD_TYPE_CUSTOM configuration. > > Cc: # 2.6.32+ > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee > --- > > v3: added the module_parameters > v2: cc-ed stable Acked-by: Willy Tarreau [ next time I'll read my mails in reverse order :-) ] Willy _

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] staging: panel: fix lcd type in module parameters

2015-03-24 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 02:56:33PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > with reference to the previous patch of the series, fixed the > lcd type in module parameters. Sudip, it's better to avoid fragmenting patches like you did, because it will result in a kernel state where there is an inconsistency b

Re: [PATCH] staging: panel: fix lcd type

2015-03-24 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 01:22:16PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 08:04:11AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > Hi Sudip! > > > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:18:10AM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > > the lcd type as defined in the Kconf

Re: [PATCH] staging: panel: fix lcd type

2015-03-24 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Sudip! On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:18:10AM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > the lcd type as defined in the Kconfig is not matching in the code. > as a result the rs, rw and en pins were getting interchanged. > Kconfig defines the value of PANEL_LCD to be 1 if we select custom > configuration but

Re: [PATCH v4] staging: panel: change struct bits to a bit array

2015-03-16 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 12:25:31PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > Both "bits.e" and "BIT_CHK(bits, LCD_BIT_E_MASK)" are terrible. The new > one is worse because it takes more words to tell you nothing and because > it is wrong since E is a flag not a mask. Yep, I agree. Maybe simply renaming "bits

Re: [PATCH v3] staging: panel: change struct bits to a bit array

2015-03-15 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hello, On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 11:14:43AM +0100, Isaac Lleida wrote: > This path implements a bit array representing the LCD signal states instead > of the old "struct bits", which used char to represent a single bit. This > will reduce the memory usage. > > Signed-off-by: Isaac Lleida > --- >

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] staging: panel: return register value

2015-03-09 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 08:08:24PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > we were returning success even if the module failed to register. > now we are returning the actual return value, success or error. > > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee Thanks for this. Acked-by: Willy Tar

Re: [PATCH 2/3] staging: panel: return register value

2015-03-09 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 07:05:59PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 07:30:07AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 08, 2015 at 11:07:25PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > > > > > - if (parport_register_driver(&panel_driver)) { &g

Re: [PATCH 2/3] staging: panel: return register value

2015-03-08 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Sun, Mar 08, 2015 at 11:07:25PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > we were returning success even if the module failed to register. > now we are returning the actual return value, success or error. > > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee > --- > drivers/staging/panel/panel.c | 7 +-- > 1 file cha

Re: [PATCH 3/3] staging: panel: remove initialization check

2015-03-08 Thread Willy Tarreau
r the module has initialized. > > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee Acked-by: Willy Tarreau willy ___ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Re: [PATCH 1/3] staging: panel: register reboot

2015-03-08 Thread Willy Tarreau
nd similarly unregister at detach. > > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee Acked-by: Willy Tarreau Willy ___ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: panel: register driver after checking device

2015-02-10 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 05:26:02PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > register the driver only if lcd or keypad has been enabled and if > both are disabled then just exit. > > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee Acked-by: Willy Tarreau Willy _

Re: [PATCH 2/2] staging: panel: initialize lcd if lcd enabled

2015-02-10 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 05:26:03PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > initialiaze lcd parameters only if lcd is enabled. > > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee One minor comment below (cosmetic), but after this it's OK. Acked-by: Willy Tarreau > +

Re: [PATCH] staging: panel: Remove magic numbers in LCD commands

2014-12-05 Thread Willy Tarreau
hat awful! Obvious ack. Acked-by: Willy Tarreau Thanks, willy ___ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Re: [PATCH] staging: panel: Remove unused variable

2014-12-03 Thread Willy Tarreau
to be missing it :-) Acked-by: Willy Tarreau Willy ___ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] staging: panel: Use defined value or checking module params state

2014-11-27 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 08:50:55PM +0100, Mariusz Gorski wrote: > > And the reason I got confused was because you didn't label your second > > set of patches "v2", which it was, I saw two separate series, one with a > > few patches, and then 2 sets of 9, the second set labeled "v2" so I > > thought

Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] staging: panel: Use defined value or checking module params state

2014-11-27 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 07:57:06AM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > And the reason I got confused was because you didn't label your second > set of patches "v2", which it was, I saw two separate series, one with a > few patches, and then 2 sets of 9, the second set labeled "v2" so I > thought the

Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] staging: panel: Refactor panel initialization

2014-11-19 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Mariusz, On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 09:38:42PM +0100, Mariusz Gorski wrote: > This set of patches focuses on making current initialization > process easier to understand - especially it tries to emphasize > what are the priorities of the params coming from different > sources (Kconfig values, devi

Re: [PATCH v2 8/9] staging: panel: Remove more magic number comparison

2014-11-19 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 09:38:50PM +0100, Mariusz Gorski wrote: > Use a defined value instead of magic number comparison > for checking whether a module param value has been set. > > Signed-off-by: Mariusz Gorski Acked-by: Willy Tarreau _

Re: [PATCH v2 7/9] staging: panel: Refactor LCD init code

2014-11-19 Thread Willy Tarreau
> > Signed-off-by: Mariusz Gorski Acked-by: Willy Tarreau ___ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] staging: panel: Make two more module params read-only

2014-11-19 Thread Willy Tarreau
m values etc). > > Signed-off-by: Mariusz Gorski Acked-by: Willy Tarreau ___ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] staging: panel: Use defined value or checking module params state

2014-11-19 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 09:38:46PM +0100, Mariusz Gorski wrote: > Avoid magic number and use a comparison with a defined value instead > that checks whether module param has been set by the user to some > value at loading time. > > Signed-off-by: Mariusz Gorski Acked-by

Re: [PATCH 7/9] staging: panel: Refactor LCD init code

2014-11-18 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 10:51:08PM +0100, Mariusz Gorski wrote: > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 10:23:26PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 09:56:12PM +0100, Mariusz Gorski wrote: > > > Rework lcd_init method to make it a little bit more clear about > >

Re: [PATCH 6/9] staging: panel: Make two more module params read-only

2014-11-18 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 10:50:35PM +0100, Mariusz Gorski wrote: > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 10:20:34PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 09:56:11PM +0100, Mariusz Gorski wrote: > > > Make keypad_type and lcd_type module params read-only. > > > This

Re: [PATCH 9/9] staging: panel: Move LCD-related state into struct lcd

2014-11-18 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 09:56:14PM +0100, Mariusz Gorski wrote: > Move more or less all LCD-related state into struct lcd > in order to get better cohesion; use bool instead of int > where it makes sense. > > Signed-off-by: Mariusz Gorski Acked-by

Re: [PATCH 8/9] staging: panel: Remove more magic number comparison

2014-11-18 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 09:56:13PM +0100, Mariusz Gorski wrote: > Use a macro instead of magic number comparison for checking > whether a module param value has been set. > > Signed-off-by: Mariusz Gorski > --- > drivers/staging/panel/panel.c | 21 +++-- > 1 file changed, 11 inse

Re: [PATCH 7/9] staging: panel: Refactor LCD init code

2014-11-18 Thread Willy Tarreau
> > Signed-off-by: Mariusz Gorski Acked-by: Willy Tarreau I like this refactoring. However I don't know if you got your LCD module to work or not, but for such important changes you should definitely test the code, since it's very easy to introduce minor bugs or even to fix a bug

Re: [PATCH 6/9] staging: panel: Make two more module params read-only

2014-11-18 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 09:56:11PM +0100, Mariusz Gorski wrote: > Make keypad_type and lcd_type module params read-only. > This step also starts making it more clear what is > the precedence of device params coming from different > sources (device profile, runtime module param values etc). > > Sig

Re: [PATCH 5/9] staging: panel: Start making module params read-only

2014-11-18 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 09:56:10PM +0100, Mariusz Gorski wrote: > Start decoupling module params from the actual device state, > both for lcd and keypad, by keeping the params read-only > and moving the device state to related structs. > > Signed-off-by: Mariusz Gorski Acked-by

Re: [PATCH 4/9] staging: panel: Use a macro for checking module params state

2014-11-18 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 09:56:09PM +0100, Mariusz Gorski wrote: > Avoid values comparison and use a macro instead that checks > whether module param has been set by the user to some value > at loading time. > > Signed-off-by: Mariusz Gorski > --- > drivers/staging/panel/panel.c | 88 > +

Re: [PATCH 2/9] staging: panel: Call init function directly

2014-11-18 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 09:56:07PM +0100, Mariusz Gorski wrote: > Remove useless function and let the kernel call the actual > init function directly. > > Signed-off-by: Mariusz Gorski Acked-by: Willy Tarreau ___ devel mai

Re: [PATCH 3/9] staging: panel: Remove magic numbers

2014-11-18 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 09:56:08PM +0100, Mariusz Gorski wrote: > Get rid of magic numbers indicating that the value of a module param > is not set. Use a defined value instead. > > Signed-off-by: Mariusz Gorski Acked-by: Willy Tarreau _

Re: [PATCH 1/9] staging: panel: Set default parport module param value

2014-11-18 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 09:56:06PM +0100, Mariusz Gorski wrote: > Set default parport module param value to DEFAULT_PARPORT so that > a if-block can be avoided. > > Signed-off-by: Mariusz Gorski Acked-by: Willy Tarreau ___ devel mai

Re: [PATCH 0/4] staging: panel: Module parameters clean-up

2014-11-11 Thread Willy Tarreau
order module parameter declarations > staging: panel: Use better names for two defined values Whole patchset Acked-By: Willy Tarreau BTW Mariusz, please use this e-mail address instead of the meta-x.org one in the future. Thanks, Willy ___ devel mai

Re: [PATCH] staging: panel: Fix single-open policy race condition

2014-11-10 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 12:51:22PM +0100, Mariusz Gorski wrote: > On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 01:19:10PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 10:47:19PM +0100, Mariusz Gorski wrote: > > > Fix the implementation of a single-open policy for both > > > devices (lcd and keypad) by using

Re: [PATCH] staging: panel: Use designated initializers

2014-10-29 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Mariusz, On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 11:32:30PM +0100, Mariusz Gorski wrote: > Fix "warning: missing initializer [-Wmissing-field-initializers]" > by using designated struct initializers. > > Signed-off-by: Mariusz Gorski Acked-by: Willy T

Re: [PATCH] Staging: panel: fixed frivilous else statement warning

2014-07-18 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 03:34:28AM -0700, Vincent Heuken wrote: > Fixed one instance of the following checkpatch.pl warning in > panel.c: > WARNING: else is not generally useful after a break or return > > Signed-off-by: Vincent Heuken Acked-By: Willy Tarreau Vincent, ar

Re: Anybody working on panel?

2014-06-20 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 11:46:45AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 09:39:26PM +0300, Kristina Mart??enko wrote: > > On 20/06/14 19:52, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > > Hi Kristina, > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 06:35:03PM +0300, Krist

Re: Anybody working on panel?

2014-06-20 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Kristina, On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 06:35:03PM +0300, Kristina Mart?enko wrote: > Hi Willy, > > I'm helping Greg do a bit of cleanup in the staging tree. I noticed that > nobody seems to have worked towards moving panel out of staging in over > a year. Are there any plans to clean it up and move

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] staging: panel: fix sparse warnings in lcd_write

2014-04-24 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 07:35:02PM +0200, Bastien Armand wrote: > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 01:01:45PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > Btw, this whole function is terrible. It should be reading larger > > chunks at once instead of get_user() for each character. Just for the record, very small chara

Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] staging: panel: fix sparse warnings.

2014-04-19 Thread Willy Tarreau
panel: fix sparse warnings in lcd_write Just reviewed them both and I'm fine with these patches. You can add my : Acked-by: Willy Tarreau Willy ___ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Re: system hang

2014-04-10 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:05:52AM -0700, narasimharo bolisetti wrote: > My kernel version is: > 2.6.35.6-45.fc14.i686 Maintenance for this kernel has been dropped years ago, so it very likely contains many bugs that were fixed in more recent ones. You should definitely upgrade. Hoping this he

Re: [PATCH] staging : panel : fix checkpatch warnings (linux-next)

2014-04-03 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 06:59:09PM +0200, armand.bast...@laposte.net wrote: > This patch fixes "Missing a blank line after declarations" checkpatch warning > in panel.c. Acked-By: Willy Tarreau Thanks Bastien for this. Willy ___ de