> Also, note that the above semantic patch is not completely safe,
> because
> the code could be, eg:
>
> int a = 0;
> a = a + 1;
>
> In that case, the initialization of a would be needed. You
> should check
> each case for this issue.
>
>
> I have c
On Tue, 21 Feb 2017, simran singhal wrote:
> Removed initialisation of a varible if it is immediately reassigned.
varible -> variable
>
> Changes were made using Coccinelle.
>
> @@
> type T;
> constant C;
> expression e;
> identifier i;
> @@
>
> T i
> - = C
> ;
> i = e;
This is a big patch, a
