On Sun, 2014-09-28 at 18:53 -0400, Jason Cooper wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 06:01:01PM -0400, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 04:54:26PM -0500, Eric Rost wrote:
> > > My first patch, resent to appropriate multiple addresses!
> >
> > That's great, but it doesn't belong here in the b
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 06:01:01PM -0400, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 04:54:26PM -0500, Eric Rost wrote:
> > My first patch, resent to appropriate multiple addresses!
>
> That's great, but it doesn't belong here in the body of the changelog :)
>
> > This patch fixes the following che
I think I stepped in it over my head. I'm going to let someone else
handle this one and see if I can find something less odd.
On Sun, 2014-09-28 at 16:27 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-09-28 at 18:53 -0400, Jason Cooper wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 06:01:01PM -0400, Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 04:54:26PM -0500, Eric Rost wrote:
> My first patch, resent to appropriate multiple addresses!
That's great, but it doesn't belong here in the body of the changelog :)
> This patch fixes the following checkpatch.pl Warnings:
>
> WARNING: suspect code indent for conditiona
My first patch, resent to appropriate multiple addresses!
This patch fixes the following checkpatch.pl Warnings:
WARNING: suspect code indent for conditional statements (16, 16)
+ for (r = 1; r < 2 * RCNT; r += 2 * SKEIN_UNROLL_512)
[...]
+ {
WARNING: suspect code ind
My first patch!
This patch fixes the following checkpatch.pl Warnings:
WARNING: suspect code indent for conditional statements (16, 16)
+ for (r = 1; r < 2 * RCNT; r += 2 * SKEIN_UNROLL_512)
[...]
+ {
WARNING: suspect code indent for conditional statements (16, 16)
+
