On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 12:06:33AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> Now, if you mean "known" to be equivalent with "recognised by
> imx-media" then, as I've pointed out several times already, that
> statement is FALSE. I'm not sure how many times I'm going to have to
> state this fact.
On 10/11/2017 04:06 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 03:14:26PM -0700, Steve Longerbeam wrote:
On 10/11/2017 02:49 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 12:09:13PM -0700, Steve Longerbeam wrote:
imx_media_link_notify() should not return
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 03:14:26PM -0700, Steve Longerbeam wrote:
>
>
> On 10/11/2017 02:49 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> >On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 12:09:13PM -0700, Steve Longerbeam wrote:
> >>imx_media_link_notify() should not return error if the source subdevice
> >>is not recognized
On 10/11/2017 02:49 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 12:09:13PM -0700, Steve Longerbeam wrote:
imx_media_link_notify() should not return error if the source subdevice
is not recognized by imx-media, that isn't an error. If the subdev has
controls they will be
On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 12:09:13PM -0700, Steve Longerbeam wrote:
> imx_media_link_notify() should not return error if the source subdevice
> is not recognized by imx-media, that isn't an error. If the subdev has
> controls they will be inherited starting from a known subdev.
What does "a known
imx_media_link_notify() should not return error if the source subdevice
is not recognized by imx-media, that isn't an error. If the subdev has
controls they will be inherited starting from a known subdev.
Signed-off-by: Steve Longerbeam
---