On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 07:20:54PM +0900, 김준환 wrote:
> Thank you for attention :)
>
> I knew what I forgot before doing contribute
>
> I updated it 'TODAY' and I'll never repeat this mistake again!
>
No rush.
This is a tiny mistake and doesn't affect runtime at all and we're all
human. The
Thank you for attention :)
I knew what I forgot before doing contribute
I updated it 'TODAY' and I'll never repeat this mistake again!
Sincerely,
JoonHwan
2018-06-16 18:06 GMT+09:00 Dan Carpenter :
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 01:30:48PM +0900, JoonHwan.Kim wrote:
>> @@ -1656,6 +1659,7 @@ static
On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 01:30:48PM +0900, JoonHwan.Kim wrote:
> @@ -1656,6 +1659,7 @@ static void atomisp_pause_buffer_event(struct
> atomisp_device *isp)
> /* invalidate. SW workaround for this is to set burst length */
> /* manually to 128 in case of 13MPx snapshot and to 1 otherwise. */
>
On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 01:30:48PM +0900, JoonHwan.Kim wrote:
> fix checkpatch.pl warning:
> * Missing a blank line after declarations
>
> Signed-off-by: Joonhwan Kim
> ---
> drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/atomisp2/atomisp_ioctl.c | 5 +
Always work against the latest development tree
fix checkpatch.pl warning:
* Missing a blank line after declarations
Signed-off-by: Joonhwan Kim
---
drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/atomisp2/atomisp_ioctl.c | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/atomisp2/atomisp_ioctl.c
