bottom...@parallels.com; linux-s...@vger.kernel.org;
> de...@linuxdriverproject.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi:storvsc enable reading from VPD pages on SPC-2
>
> >>>>> "Long" == Long Li writes:
>
> >> Handle the
> "Long" == Long Li writes:
>> Handle the issues or handle WRITE SAME(10/16)?
Long> With this patch, the SCSI layer will be able to correctly send
Long> WRITE_SAME_16 to the Hyper-V host. It will not send WRITE_SAME_10:
Long> it has been disabled in the driver template. Do you want me to
Lon
.org; linux-
> ker...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi:storvsc enable reading from VPD pages on SPC-2
>
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 11:30:30PM +, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > > + {"Msft", "Virtual Disk", "
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 11:30:30PM +, KY Srinivasan wrote:
>
> > >
> > > + {"Msft", "Virtual Disk", "1.0", BLIST_TRY_VPD_PAGES},
> > >
> > > Is that version field meaningful or is it safe for us to inquire about
> > > VPD pages without problems on older versions?
> >
> > This version is used
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] scsi:storvsc enable reading from VPD pages on SPC-2
>
> > >>>>> "Long" == Long Li writes:
> >
> > Long> MSFT targets currently claim SPC-2 compliance while they
> > Long> implement post SPC-2 features. With this patc
er...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi:storvsc enable reading from VPD pages on SPC-2
>
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 12:38:25AM -0800, Long Li wrote:
> > MSFT targets currently claim SPC-2 compliance while they implement
> > post SPC-2 features. With this patch we can
> > "Long" == Long Li writes:
>
> Long> MSFT targets currently claim SPC-2 compliance while they implement
> Long> post SPC-2 features. With this patch we can correctly handle
> Long> WRITE_SAME_16 issues.
>
> Handle the issues or handle WRITE SAME(10/16)?
With this patch, the SCSI layer wi
> "Long" == Long Li writes:
Long> MSFT targets currently claim SPC-2 compliance while they implement
Long> post SPC-2 features. With this patch we can correctly handle
Long> WRITE_SAME_16 issues.
Handle the issues or handle WRITE SAME(10/16)?
+ {"Msft", "Virtual Disk", "1.0", BLIST_TR
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 12:38:25AM -0800, Long Li wrote:
> MSFT targets currently claim SPC-2 compliance while they implement
> post SPC-2 features. With this patch we can correctly handle
> WRITE_SAME_16 issues.
>
> This patch fixes an issue where the flag is setup too late in drive
> initializat
MSFT targets currently claim SPC-2 compliance while they implement post SPC-2
features. With this patch we can correctly handle WRITE_SAME_16 issues.
This patch fixes an issue where the flag is setup too late in drive
initialization process.
Reviewed-by: K. Y. Srinivasan
Signed-off-by: Long Li
10 matches
Mail list logo
