On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 08:10:32PM -0700, Rom Lemarchand wrote:
> We would also like to make kernel-t...@android.com the maintainer of
> the whole android directory.
Mailing lists can't be a maintainer, but you could add it as a private
list in the MAINTAINERS file.
regards,
dan carpenter
__
On Tue, 2014-10-21 at 20:10 -0700, Rom Lemarchand wrote:
> On the topic of maintainers for binder: both Arve Hjønnevåg
> (a...@android.com) and Riley Andrews (riandr...@android.com) have
> volunteered to be co-maintainers with Greg.
>
> We would also like to make kernel-t...@android.com the mainta
On the topic of maintainers for binder: both Arve Hjønnevåg
(a...@android.com) and Riley Andrews (riandr...@android.com) have
volunteered to be co-maintainers with Greg.
We would also like to make kernel-t...@android.com the maintainer of
the whole android directory.
__
On Tue 2014-10-21 16:12:24, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 October 2014 12:36:22 Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Fri 2014-10-17 01:12:21, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 10:09:04AM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 5:47 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > > >
On Tuesday 21 October 2014 12:36:22 Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Fri 2014-10-17 01:12:21, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 10:09:04AM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 5:47 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > > wrote:
> > > > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
>
> > > Are the
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 06:04:50AM +0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> There is now work to resolve the interface, it requires someone who has
> the rights to push to Android userspace. But that is going to be a
> "total rewrite", and until then, this code needs to be used, no matter
> how much we
On Fri 2014-10-17 01:12:21, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 10:09:04AM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 5:47 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > wrote:
> > > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > Are the Android guys comfortable with the ABI stability rules they'll
> > now
On Fri 2014-10-17 01:14:57, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 04:18:02PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > wrote:
> > > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > >
> > > The Android binder code has been "stable" for many yea
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 2:20 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 06:05:47AM +0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 12:26:01PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>> > The code isn't very beautiful and there are lots of details wrong like
>> > the error codes.
>>
>> Real
On Thursday 16 October 2014 14:47:41 Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
>
> The Android binder code has been "stable" for many years now. No matter
> what comes in the future, we are going to have to support this API, so
> might as well move it to the "real" part of the kernel
Having documentation would help reviewers.
Here is some documentation I found online.
http://www.phonesdevelopers.com/1793504/
But it seems like it was originally written in another language and auto
translated to English.
I don't see who is going to maintain this, if no one has time to even
docu
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 06:05:47AM +0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 12:26:01PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > The code isn't very beautiful and there are lots of details wrong like
> > the error codes.
>
> Really, what is wrong with the existing error code usages?
>
I
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 12:26:01PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> The code isn't very beautiful and there are lots of details wrong like
> the error codes.
Really, what is wrong with the existing error code usages?
> Al had some critical things to say about it but it looks like most of
> those iss
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 02:43:29AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 02:47:41PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
> >
> > The Android binder code has been "stable" for many years now. No matter
> > what comes in the future, we are going to have
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 10:36:30PM +0100, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
> > Do we really need someone to do more work that has been done on it in
> > the past as an official "maintainer"? I'll be glad to do it, as I doubt
> > it will require any time at all.
>
> Well every time in the past that Al V
> Do we really need someone to do more work that has been done on it in
> the past as an official "maintainer"? I'll be glad to do it, as I doubt
> it will require any time at all.
Well every time in the past that Al Viro looked in its direction he broke
it so probably. Someone is going to have t
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 02:47:41PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
>
> The Android binder code has been "stable" for many years now. No matter
> what comes in the future, we are going to have to support this API, so
> might as well move it to the "real" part of the ke
The code isn't very beautiful and there are lots of details wrong like
the error codes.
Al had some critical things to say about it but it looks like most of
those issues have been fixed.
regards,
dan carpenter
___
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverp
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 08:25:33PM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 10:09:04AM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> >> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 5:47 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> >> wrote:
> >> > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
> >> >
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 10:09:04AM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 5:47 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>> wrote:
>> > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
>> >
>> > The Android binder code has been "stable" for many years now. No mat
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 04:18:02PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> wrote:
> > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
> >
> > The Android binder code has been "stable" for many years now. No matter
> > what comes in the future, we are going to h
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 10:09:04AM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 5:47 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> wrote:
> > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
> >
> > The Android binder code has been "stable" for many years now. No matter
>
> Well, ignoring the ABI break that landed in the last year.
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 5:47 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
>
> The Android binder code has been "stable" for many years now. No matter
Well, ignoring the ABI break that landed in the last year. :)
> what comes in the future, we are going to have to support this API,
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
>
> The Android binder code has been "stable" for many years now. No matter
> what comes in the future, we are going to have to support this API, so
> might as well move it to the "real" part of the kernel as t
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
The Android binder code has been "stable" for many years now. No matter
what comes in the future, we are going to have to support this API, so
might as well move it to the "real" part of the kernel as there's no
real work that needs to be done to the existing code.
Sign
25 matches
Mail list logo
