On 10/12/18 11:04 AM, Ian Abbott wrote:
> On 11/10/2018 20:05, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> Currently, there are multiple missing break statements in two switch code
>> blocks. This makes the execution path to fall all the way down through
>> to the default cases, which makes the function ni_tio
On 11/10/2018 20:05, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
Currently, there are multiple missing break statements in two switch code
blocks. This makes the execution path to fall all the way down through
to the default cases, which makes the function ni_tio_set_gate_src() to
always return -EINVAL.
Fix this
Currently, there are multiple missing break statements in two switch code
blocks. This makes the execution path to fall all the way down through
to the default cases, which makes the function ni_tio_set_gate_src() to
always return -EINVAL.
Fix this by adding the missing break statements.
Also, no
