This patch fixes the sparse warnings in
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec_lproc.c:
sec_lproc.c:58:6: warning: symbol 'sec_flags2str' was not declared. Should it
be static?
Signed-off-by: Scott Weir
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec_lproc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(
This patch fixes the following sparse warnings for
drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router.c:
router.c:139:1: warning: symbol 'lnet_ni_notify_locked' was not declared.
Should it be static?
router.c:277:1: warning: symbol 'lnet_add_route_to_rnet' was not declared.
Should it be static?
Signed-of
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 03:19:18PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>
> Why not just make them static? They don't seem to be used outside of
> that file. What am I missing?
>
Given a 50/50 choice I based my decision on the surrounding functions which
were mostly defined in the header file.
I shou
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 01:03:48PM +0100, John Church wrote:
> This patch fixes the following sparse warnings for
> drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router.c:
>
> router.c:139:1: warning: symbol 'lnet_ni_notify_locked' was not declared.
> Should it be static?
> router.c:277:1: warning: symbol 'l
This patch fixes the following sparse warnings for
drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router.c:
router.c:139:1: warning: symbol 'lnet_ni_notify_locked' was not declared.
Should it be static?
router.c:277:1: warning: symbol 'lnet_add_route_to_rnet' was not declared.
Should it be static?
Signed-of
